Adams, et al v. USA

Filing 1466

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Regarding DuPont's Rule 50(A) Motion on Plaintiffs' Debt Based Costs. DuPonts Rule 50(a) motion for judgment on debt based costs 1239 is Denied. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ) TIMM ADAMS, et al, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) et al, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________) Civ. No. 03-0049-E-BLW MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER REGARDING DUPONT'S RULE 50(A) MOTION ON PLAINTIFFS' DEBT BASED COSTS INTRODUCTION The Court has before it DuPont's Rule 50(a) motion for judgment on plaintiffs' debt based cost claims. For the reasons expressed below, the Court will deny the motion. ANALYSIS In a prior decision (docket no. 1138), the Court discussed at length plaintiffs' claim for debt based costs, the testimony of Hofman that supported that claim, and Memorandum Decision & Order ­ page 1 the key Idaho case of Spreader Specialists Inc. v. Monroc, Inc., 752 P.2d 617 (Id.Ct.App. 1987), overruled on other grounds, Walton v. Jensen, 979 P.2d 118 (Id.Sup.Ct. 1999) . The Court finds nothing in the present motion warranting a reconsideration of that decision. DuPont argues that Idaho law limits debt based cost claims to new loans. The Court disagrees. The rationale in Spreader Specialists applies to the facts encountered here, where the Growers were unable to pay down existing operating lines of credit due to Oust losses. Whether they are unable to pay down an existing operating line of credit due to Oust losses or must take out a new loan, the situation is the same under the reasoning of Spreader Specialists. DuPont's objection will be preserved for appeal because the Special Verdict Form will separate out the debt based costs for award. But the Court does not find persuasive DuPont's arguments in support of its motion. For these reasons, the Court will deny the motion. ORDER In accordance with the Memorandum Decision filed above, NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that DuPont's Rule 50(a) motion for judgment on debt based costs (docket no. 1239) is DENIED. Memorandum Decision & Order ­ page 2 DATED: August 14, 2009 Honorable B. Lynn Winmill Chief U. S. District Judge Memorandum Decision & Order ­ page 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?