Adams, et al v. USA

Filing 2072

ORDER RE BLM'S MOTION TO STAY denying 1916 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO TIMM ADAMS, et al., Case No. 4:CV 03-49-BLW Plaintiffs, v. ORDER RE BLM’S MOTION TO STAY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. The Court has before it the BLM’s motion to stay these proceedings pending the Ninth Circuit’s ruling. The Ninth Circuit has now ruled in the BLM’s favor. If the mandate issues, and the BLM is dismissed, the case will nevertheless continue against DuPont. Hence, even if the BLM is dismissed, this matter should not be stayed. On the other hand, if any claims remain against the BLM – a point the Court expresses no opinion upon – there are even stronger reasons for denying the motion to stay. Accordingly, NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the motion to stay (docket no. 1916) is DENIED. DATED: September 15, 2011 Honorable B. Lynn Winmill Chief U. S. District Judge Memorandum Decision & Order - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?