Government Empl Med, et al v. Regence Blue Shield, et al

Filing 247

JUDGMENT granting 95 104 157 and 158 motions for summary judgment, granting 186 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, granting 188 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, granting 200 Motion to Seal, granting 211 Motion to Exclude, denyin g 212 Motion to Exclude, denying 216 Motion to Exclude, finding as moot 218 Motion to Exclude, finding as moot 220 Motion to Exclude, finding as moot 221 Motion to Exclude; This matter is dismissed in its entirety. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by dkh, )

Download PDF
Government Empl Med, et al v. Regence Blue Shield, et al Doc. 247 Case 4:04-cv-00284-BLW-MHW Document 247 Filed 03/31/2006 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES ) MEDICAL PLAN, a/k/a GEMPLAN, an ) Idaho Legal Entity; BOARD OF ) TRUSTEES OF GEMPLAN, in their ) Capacity as Trustees of the Trust Fund of ) GEMPLAN'S Self-funded Health Care ) Plan; and MUTUAL INSURANCE ) ASSOCIATES, INC., an Idaho Corporation,) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) REGENCE BLUE SHIELD OF IDAHO, ) INC., an Idaho Corporation; and BLUE ) CROSS OF IDAHO HEALTH SERVICES, ) INC., an Idaho Corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________) Case No. CV-04-284-E-BLW JUDGMENT In accordance with the Memorandum Decision filed with this Judgment, NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that the motions for summary judgment (Docket Nos. 95, 104, 157, and 158) be GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that the motion for partial summary judgment (Docket No. 186) and motion for partial Judgment - 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 4:04-cv-00284-BLW-MHW Document 247 Filed 03/31/2006 Page 2 of 3 summary judgment (Docket No. 188) are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that the motion to exclude expert testimony of William T. O'Brien (Docket No. 211) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that the motion to exclude expert testimony of James Langenfeld (Docket Nos. 212 and 216) are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that the motions to exclude (Docket Nos. 218, 220, and 221) are DEEMED MOOT as those matters were not considered by the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that the motion to seal (Docket No. 200) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that by virtue of the resolution of the motions listed above, this matter shall be DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close Judgment - 2 Case 4:04-cv-00284-BLW-MHW Document 247 Filed 03/31/2006 Page 3 of 3 the case. DATED: March 31, 2006 B. LYNN WINMILL Chief Judge United States District Court Judgment - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?