Putnam v. Boll et al
Filing
2
ORDER granting 1 Motion to Waive. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
JENNIFER PUTNAM,
Case No. 4:16-cv-00013-BLW
Plaintiffs,
v.
PETE BOLL and CITY OF
POCATELLO,
ORDER
Defendants.
The Court has before it Plaintiff’s Motion to Waive Bond or Set at $0 (Dkt. 1).
Plaintiff has initiated a lawsuit against a law enforcement officer. Idaho Code § 6–610(2)
requires a plaintiff to post bond before she initiates suit against a law enforcement officer.
Plaintiffs ask the Court to waive that bond because their state law claims are intertwined
with their §1983 claims, and requiring a bond would work an injustice and inhibit the
Plaintiffs’ pursuit of their federal claims. Plaintiffs cite no authority for such a waiver,
and the Court is aware of none.
However, a court may waive costs, fees and security for indigents under Idaho
Code § 31–3220 if the party files an affidavit stating that she is indigent and unable to
pay the costs. The Court may only do soif, after an informal inquiry, such as reviewing
affidavits, the Court finds that the party is indigent. I.C. § 31–3220(2).
ORDER - 1
Here, Plaintiff filed an affidavit. She makes $1800 per month after business
expenses, but she is in the process of closing her business and selling the building.
Putnam Aff., Dkt. 1-1. She has $800 per month in medical expenses, cares for two
dependents, suffers from MS, is only able to work 2 days a week, and is seriously
delinquent in paying her property taxes and credit card payments. Id. She can't meet her
monthly living expenses. Id. Accordingly, the Court will grant the motion.
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Waive Bond or Set at $0 (Dkt. 1) is GRANTED.
DATED: January 22, 2016
_________________________
B. Lynn Winmill
Chief Judge
United States District Court
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?