Oldcastle Precast, Inc. v. Concrete Accessories of Georgia, Inc

Filing 94

GRANTING DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIMANTS MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT COUNSELS AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIMANTS MOTION IN LIMINE (DKT. 64 ) - The Motion to Supplement Counsels Affidavit in Support ofDefendant/counterclaimants Motion in Limine ( Dkt. 92 ) is HEREBY GRANTED. In Addition, Counter/crossclaimant Areva Federal Services, LLCs request for additional time to respond to CONACs arguments that rely on Mr. Spiekers deposition, Areva Federal Services, LLCs Memorandum in Opposition to CO NACs Motion in Limine (Dkt. 90 ), n.1, is HEREBY GRANTED. It is HEREBY ORDERED that Areva Federal Services LLCs Response to CONACs arguments that Rely on Mr. Spiekers deposition is due on December 7, 2018 and CONACs Reply in Support of its Motion in Limine (Dkt. 64 ) is due on December 21, 2018. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
OLDCASTLE PRECAST, INC. a
Washington corporation,
Case No. 4:17-cv-164-BLW-CWD
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant,
vs.
CONCRETE ACCESSORIES OF
GEORGIA, INC., a Georgia corporation,
Defendant/Counterclaimant,
And

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT/
COUNTERCLAIMANT’S MOTION TO
SUPPLEMENT COUNSEL’S
AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANT/
COUNTERCLAIMANT’S MOTION IN
LIMINE (DKT. 64)

AREVA FEDERAL SERVICES LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company, and
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY, a Massachusetts corporation,
Defendants.

AREVA FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC,
Counter/crossclaimant,
vs.
OLDCASTLE PRECAST, INC.,
counterdefendant, and LIBERTY MUTUAL
INSURANCE COMPANY, Crossclaim
Defendant.
The

Motion

to

Supplement

Counsel’s

Affidavit

in

Support

of

Defendant/counterclaimant’s Motion in Limine (Dkt. 64) having come before this Court, the Court
finds good cause to permit Defendant/counterclaimant Concrete Accessories of Georgia, Inc.
(“CONAC”) to supplement the record to include relevant portions of the transcript of the
deposition of Henry Spieker.

ORDER - 1

The

Motion

to

Supplement

Counsel’s

Affidavit

in

Support

of

Defendant/counterclaimant’s Motion in Limine is HEREBY GRANTED. In Addition,
Counter/crossclaimant Areva Federal Services, LLC’s request for additional time to respond to
CONAC’s arguments that rely on Mr. Spieker’s deposition, Areva Federal Services, LLC’s
Memorandum in Opposition to CONAC’s Motion in Limine (Dkt. 90), n.1, is HEREBY
GRANTED.
It is HEREBY ORDERED that Areva Federal Services LLC’s Response to
CONAC’s arguments that Rely on Mr. Spieker’s deposition is due on December 7, 2018 and
CONAC’s Reply in Support of its Motion in Limine (Dkt. 64) is due on December 21, 2018.

DATED: November 29, 2018
_________________________
B. Lynn Winmill
Chief Judge
United States District Court

ORDER - 2