Arizona Lithium Company Ltd. et al v. North American Cobalt Inc
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER re #59 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Expert Opinion Testimony not Previously Disclosed and Evidence Created by Plaintiffs after Close of Discovery filed by North American Cobalt Inc, #45 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by North American Cobalt Inc, and #50 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Partial) filed by International Cobalt Corp, Arizona Lithium Company Ltd., Idaho Metals Corp. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: NAC's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #45 ) is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART. NAC's Motion (Dkt. #45 ) is further GRANTED to the extent it seeks dismissal of BOCO Claims 3-8. The Motion is DENIED in all other respects. Arizona Lithium's Motion for Partial Summary (Dkt. #50 ) is DENIED. NAC's Motion in Limine (Dkt. #59 ) is dismissed as moot. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, the parties shall submit their unavailable trial dates starting in January, 2020, and also state how many days they believe it will take to try this matter. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ckh)
1. The BATT Claims
2. The BOCO Claims
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett
Clicks Billiards Inc. v. Sixshooters
Inc
Anderson v.
Liberty Lobby, Inc
Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp
A.C.L.U. of Nev. v. City of Las Vegas
see also Pintos v. Pac.
Creditors Ass’n
Las Vegas Sands, LLC v. Nehme
Hedrick v. Lee
Krottner v. Starbucks Corp
see also
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife
Id
Id
Id
Simon v. Eastern Ky. Welfare Rights Org
Krottner
Bowles v. Pro Indiviso, Inc
Hall v. Childers
Id
Lewiston Lime Co. v. Barney
Crandall
v. Goss
Thomas v.
Anchorage Equal Rights Comm’n
in the absence of an adverse claim to the property at issue Whitney v. Randall
see
also Monreal v. GMAC Mortg
inter alia
Perego v.
Dodge
controversy
see also United States v. Coleman
Belk v. Meagher
Id
Forbes v. Gracey
Davis v. Nelson
Henault Mining Co. v. Tysk
pedis possessio
pedis possessio
pedis possessio
Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. Smith
Pedis possessio
Geomet Expl., Ltd. v. Lucky McUranium Corp
Id
pedis possessio
Clearwater Minerals Corp. v. Presnell
Hanson v. Craig
pedis possessio
Id
pedis possessio
Belk
Davis
Mines and Minerals
see also Cole v. Ralph
Grant v.
Pilgrim
United States v. Jerry E. Franklin
Id
Id
Barrows v. Hickel
Converse v. Udall
Allen v.
Laudahn
Allen
Norris v. United Mineral Products Co
Pitcher v. Jones
Id
Id
possibilities
Id
Allen
Id
Id
Norris
Id
Henault
Id.
See, e.g
possibility
Henault
.
United States v. Gray
v. Hammitt
Cameron v. United States
Barton v. Morton
Mulkern
Id
Ranchers Expl. & Dev. Co. v. Anaconda Co
each
Co
Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining
Cameron
See, e.g
Ranchers
Davis
Matsushita
pedis possessio
pedis possessio
pedis possessio
possessio
See Parker v. Jones
pedis
Belk
Mines and Minerals
See
et. seq
United States v.
Haskins
Roberts v. Morton
Book v. Justice Mining Co.
Id
Id
White v. Ames Mining Co
Id
Hedrick
Bismark
Mountain Gold Mining Co. v. N. Sunbeam Gold Co
Vevelstad v. Flynn
Id
before
in heigh
Id
White
Bismark Mtn.
Id
Id
Id
Id
Id
Bismark
White
Independence Placer Mining Co. v. Hellman
Id
pretend
Morrison v. Regan
Independence Placer
see also Bismark Min. Co
Gerber v. Wheeler
Ranchers Expl.
Federal Civil Procedure
Mines and Minerals
see also Skaw v. U.S.
Continental Oil Co. v. Natrona Services
Morrison
Pedis Possessio
a. Pedis possessio
pedis possessio
Union Oil
Davis
Minidoka Irrigation Dist. v.
Kearney v. Standard Ins. Co
Dep’t of Interior
Id
Id
pedis possessio
Id
pedis possessio
pedis possessio
pedis possessio
pedis possessio Id
b. Arizona Lithium’s staking
pedis possessio
Union Oil
see also Hanson v. Craig
See supra
pedis possessio
0
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?