Johnson v. Maroco

Filing 7

OPINION & ORDER Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 1/20/10 adopting Report and Recommendations re 6 Report and Recommendations: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED for want of prosecution. (cc: pro se plaintiff). (TK, ilcd)

Wednesday, 20 January, 2010 02:05:59 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD

E-FILED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
PEORIA DIVISION
NATHAN LAMAR JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. HARRY MAROCO, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No. 09-cv-1173

O P I N I O N and O R D E R
Before the court is Magistrate Judge Cudmore's Report and Recommendation [Doc. 6] recommending that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff failed to serve Defendant with a summons and the Complaint within the time provided by Rule 4(m). The Plaintiff has not filed any objections within the ten (10) working days allotted by 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1). Failure to timely object constitutes a waiver of any objections. See Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21 Ltd., 797 F.2d 538 (7th Cir. 1986). Accordingly, this Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED for want of prosecution. CASE TERMINATED. Entered this 20th day of January, 2010 s/ Joe B. McDade JOE BILLY MCDADE United States District Judge