Pawloski vs. Astrue

Filing 10

ORDER entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 1/26/10. This matter is before the Court sua sponte. On January 21, 2010, this matter was transferred from the Northern District of Illinois. The transfer Order indicates that it was filed in the wrong div ision. Title 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) provides that an action challenging the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security must be "bought in the district court of the United States for the judicial district in which the plaintiff resid es...." The amended complaint indicates that Plaintiff resides in Earlville, which is located in LaSalle County. LaSalle County is located in the Eastern Division of the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. This case is accrodingly TRANSFERRED to that division. (FDT, ilcd)

Download PDF
Wednesday, 27 January, 2010 01:09:42 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD E-FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION LEILANI PAWLOSKI, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 10-cv-1017 O P I N I O N and O R D E R This matter is before the Court sua sponte. On January 21, 2010, this matter was transferred from the Northern District of Illinois. The transfer Order indicates that it was filed in the wrong division. Title 42 U.S.C. 405(g) provides that an action challenging the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security must be "bought in the district court of the United States for the judicial district in which the plaintiff resides . . . ." The amended complaint indicates that Plaintiff resides in Earlville, which is located in LaSalle County. LaSalle County is located in the Eastern Division of the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. This case is accordingly TRANSFERRED to that division. Entered this 26th day of January, 2010 s/ Joe B. McDade JOE BILLY MCDADE United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?