Beaman v. Souk et al

Filing 82

ORDER denying 74 Motion for Reconsideration; adopting in full Report and Recommendations 81 . See written order. Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 12/21/12. (JBM8, ilcd).

E-FILED

Friday, 21 December, 2012 10:00:09 AM
Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
PEORIA DIVISION
ALAN BEAMAN,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES SOUK, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 10-cv-1019

ORDER & OPINION
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration of
the Court’s dismissal of Count I against Defendants Souk and Reynard (Doc. 74),
and

Magistrate

Judge

Cudmore’s

Report

&

Recommendation

(“R&R”)

recommending its denial (Doc. 81).
The parties were notified that failure to object to Judge Cudmore’s December
3, 2012 R&R within fourteen working days after service of the R&R would
constitute a waiver of any objections. (Doc. 81 at 6). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see
also Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538, 539 (7th Cir. 1986).
Objections to the R&R were due by December 20, 2012, and none were made. This
Court has reviewed the R&R, and will adopt it in its entirety.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Court ADOPTS the Report and
Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 81) in full, and DENIES Plaintiff’s
Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s dismissal of Count I against Defendants
Souk and Reynard (Doc. 74).

Entered this 21st day of December, 2013.

s/ Joe B. McDade
JOE BILLY McDADE
United States Senior District Judge

2