Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
20
ORDER re the parties' Joint Stipulation to Remand to the Commissioner 19 . See Written Order. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 12/15/2014. (KZ, ilcd)
E-FILED
Monday, 15 December, 2014 10:55:34 AM
Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD
IN THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
PEORIA DIVISION
BRITTANY RENEE WILSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 1:14-cv-01121-JEH
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
Order
This matter is now before the Court on the parties’ Joint Stipulation to
Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. 19). In their Stipulation, the parties jointly
request that the Court reverse this case and remand for further proceedings
pursuant to sentence four of 42 USC § 405(g), which authorizes the Court “to
enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming,
modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with
or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.” 42 USC § 405(g). The parties
stipulate that upon remand, the Administrative Law Judge will be directed to: 1)
reevaluate the medical and other opinions of record; 2) further evaluate
Plaintiff’s subjective symptoms; and 3) further assess Plaintiff’s residual
functional capacity; 4) obtain, if necessary, supplemental testimony from a
vocational expert; and 5) issue a new decision.
The Court finds the request for remand appropriate and so the Joint
Stipulation to Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. 19) is GRANTED.
Accordingly, the Commissioner’s decision in this matter is REVERSED and the
case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for a new hearing pursuant to the
1
fourth sentence of 42 USC § 405(g). The Clerk’s Office is hereby directed to enter
Judgment in favor of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant. This matter is now
terminated.
Entered on December 15, 2014.
s/Jonathan E. Hawley
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?