Harbeck v. Colvin
Filing
17
ORDER entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 5/16/2017. The Court now adopts the Report & Recommendation 16 of the Magistrate Judge in its entirety. Defendants Motion 14 for Summary Affirmance is GRANTED and Plaintiffs Motion 7 for Summary Judgment is DENIED.This matter is now terminated.(RK, ilcd)
E-FILED
Tuesday, 16 May, 2017 02:07:19 PM
Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
TANYA HARBECK,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN COLVIN, Commissioner of
Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 15-1455
ORDER
This matter is now before the Court on an April 24, 2017 Report and Recommendation
from Magistrate Judge Hawley. Doc. 16. More than 14 days have elapsed since the filing of the
Report & Recommendation, and no objections have been made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.
R. Civ. P. 72(b); Lockert v. Faulkner, 843 F.2d 1015 (7th Cir. 1988); Video Views, Inc. v. Studio
21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538, 539 (7th Cir. 1986). As the parties failed to present timely objections, any
such objections have been waived. Id.
The relevant procedural history has been sufficiently outlined in the comprehensive
Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff claims the ALJ erred in: (1)
evaluating the severity and limitations stemming from her fibromyalgia; (2) reevaluating opinion
evidence; (3) assessing her subjective complaints; (4) reconsidering her maximum RFC; and (5)
finding that she can perform one of her past jobs. The Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s
detailed discussion and recommendation.
1
Accordingly, the Court now adopts the Report & Recommendation [16] of the Magistrate
Judge in its entirety. Defendant’s Motion [14] for Summary Affirmance is GRANTED and
Plaintiff’s Motion [7] for Summary Judgment is DENIED.
This matter is now terminated.
Signed on this 16th day of May, 2017.
s/ James E. Shadid
James E. Shadid
Chief United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?