Harbeck v. Colvin

Filing 17

ORDER entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 5/16/2017. The Court now adopts the Report & Recommendation 16 of the Magistrate Judge in its entirety. Defendants Motion 14 for Summary Affirmance is GRANTED and Plaintiffs Motion 7 for Summary Judgment is DENIED.This matter is now terminated.(RK, ilcd)

Download PDF
E-FILED Tuesday, 16 May, 2017 02:07:19 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS TANYA HARBECK, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 15-1455 ORDER This matter is now before the Court on an April 24, 2017 Report and Recommendation from Magistrate Judge Hawley. Doc. 16. More than 14 days have elapsed since the filing of the Report & Recommendation, and no objections have been made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Lockert v. Faulkner, 843 F.2d 1015 (7th Cir. 1988); Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538, 539 (7th Cir. 1986). As the parties failed to present timely objections, any such objections have been waived. Id. The relevant procedural history has been sufficiently outlined in the comprehensive Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff claims the ALJ erred in: (1) evaluating the severity and limitations stemming from her fibromyalgia; (2) reevaluating opinion evidence; (3) assessing her subjective complaints; (4) reconsidering her maximum RFC; and (5) finding that she can perform one of her past jobs. The Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s detailed discussion and recommendation. 1 Accordingly, the Court now adopts the Report & Recommendation [16] of the Magistrate Judge in its entirety. Defendant’s Motion [14] for Summary Affirmance is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s Motion [7] for Summary Judgment is DENIED. This matter is now terminated. Signed on this 16th day of May, 2017. s/ James E. Shadid James E. Shadid Chief United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?