Long v. Tilden et al
Filing
6
MERIT REVIEW OPINION: Pursuant to its merit review of the Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court finds that Plaintiff states the following constitutional claims: Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to his serious medical ne eds; Eighth Amendment claim for inhumane conditions of confinement in the observation cell; and, a First Amendment retaliation claim based on Plaintiff's complaints for proper medical care. The clerk is directed to attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. The clerk is directed to email Plaintiff's complaint and this order to Attorney Doug Bitner. The Clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. By June 30, 2017, Defendants are directed to respond to Plaintiff's request in his complaint for a preliminary injunction. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 6/6/2017. (MJC, ilcd)
E-FILED
Tuesday, 06 June, 2017 09:49:57 AM
Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
LAWRENCE LONG,
Plaintiff,
v.
ANDREW TILDEN, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
17-CV-1247
MERIT REVIEW OPINION
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. District Judge.
Plaintiff proceeds pro se from his incarceration in Pontiac
Correctional Center. His Complaint is before the Court for a merit review
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. This section requires the Court to
identify cognizable claims stated by the Complaint or dismiss claims that
are not cognizable.1 In reviewing the complaint, the Court accepts the
factual allegations as true, liberally construing them in Plaintiff's favor
and taking Plaintiff’s pro se status into account. Turley v. Rednour, 729
F.3d 645, 649 (7th Cir. 2013). However, conclusory statements and
labels are insufficient. Enough facts must be provided to "'state a claim
for relief that is plausible on its face.'" Alexander v. U.S., 721 F.3d 418,
422 (7th Cir. 2013)(quoted cite omitted).
1
A prisoner who has had three prior actions dismissed for failure to state a claim or as frivolous or malicious can
no longer proceed in forma pauperis unless the prisoner is under “imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28
U.S.C. § 1915(g).
Page 1 of 7
Plaintiff alleges that he has been delayed and denied proper
treatment for chronic deep vein thrombosis in his left leg and his risk of
pulmonary embolisms. In December 2016, Plaintiff was seen for an
emergency evaluation by an outside doctor, who changed Plaintiff’s
medications and added some more medications. (Compl. ¶ 25.) After his
return from the evaluation, Plaintiff was placed in a cell for “medical
evaluation,” Plaintiff believes in part to retaliate against Plaintiff and his
family members for complaining about the lack of medical care. The first
day in the observation cell, Plaintiff had no heat, no mattress, and no
blanket. He was deprived of meals and later given a urine-soaked
mattress, forcing him to sleep on the floor. Additionally, Plaintiff is being
required to work at a job contraindicated for his condition. Plaintiff
alleges that he has not received appropriate follow-up care, including an
appointment with a specialist and consideration of the placement of a leg
stent to prevent future problems. Plaintiff references exhibits, but the
exhibits are not in the docket.
Plaintiff’s allegations state Eighth Amendment claims for deliberate
indifference to his serious medical needs and inhumane conditions of
confinement in the observation cell. Plaintiff also states a First
Amendment retaliation claim. Plaintiff has not yet filed a petition to
proceed in forma pauperis or paid the filing fee, but the Court will send
Page 2 of 7
the case for service given the potentially serious nature of Plaintiff’s
allegations. Plaintiff’s fee status will be resolved at a later date.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:
1)
Pursuant to its merit review of the Complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A, the Court finds that Plaintiff states the following constitutional
claims: Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to his
serious medical needs; Eighth Amendment claim for inhumane
conditions of confinement in the observation cell; and, a First
Amendment retaliation claim based on Plaintiff’s complaints for proper
medical care. This case proceeds solely on the claims identified in this
paragraph. Any additional claims shall not be included in the case,
except at the Court’s discretion on motion by a party for good cause
shown or pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15.
2)
This case is now in the process of service. Plaintiff is advised
to wait until counsel has appeared for Defendants before filing any
motions, in order to give Defendants notice and an opportunity to
respond to those motions. Motions filed before Defendants' counsel has
filed an appearance will generally be denied as premature. Plaintiff need
not submit any evidence to the Court at this time, unless otherwise
directed by the Court.
Page 3 of 7
3)
The Court will attempt service on Defendants by mailing each
Defendant a waiver of service. Defendants have 60 days from the date
the waiver is sent to file an Answer. If Defendants have not filed Answers
or appeared through counsel within 90 days of the entry of this order,
Plaintiff may file a motion requesting the status of service. After
Defendants have been served, the Court will enter an order setting
discovery and dispositive motion deadlines.
4)
With respect to a Defendant who no longer works at the
address provided by Plaintiff, the entity for whom that Defendant worked
while at that address shall provide to the Clerk said Defendant's current
work address, or, if not known, said Defendant's forwarding address.
This information shall be used only for effectuating service.
Documentation of forwarding addresses shall be retained only by the
Clerk and shall not be maintained in the public docket nor disclosed by
the Clerk.
5)
Defendants shall file an answer within 60 days of the date the
waiver is sent by the Clerk. A motion to dismiss is not an answer. The
answer should include all defenses appropriate under the Federal Rules.
The answer and subsequent pleadings shall be to the issues and claims
stated in this Opinion. In general, an answer sets forth Defendants'
positions. The Court does not rule on the merits of those positions
Page 4 of 7
unless and until a motion is filed by Defendants. Therefore, no response
to the answer is necessary or will be considered.
6)
This District uses electronic filing, which means that, after
Defense counsel has filed an appearance, Defense counsel will
automatically receive electronic notice of any motion or other paper filed
by Plaintiff with the Clerk. Plaintiff does not need to mail to Defense
counsel copies of motions and other papers that Plaintiff has filed with
the Clerk. However, this does not apply to discovery requests and
responses. Discovery requests and responses are not filed with the
Clerk. Plaintiff must mail his discovery requests and responses directly
to Defendants' counsel. Discovery requests or responses sent to the
Clerk will be returned unfiled, unless they are attached to and the
subject of a motion to compel. Discovery does not begin until Defense
counsel has filed an appearance and the Court has entered a scheduling
order, which will explain the discovery process in more detail.
7)
Counsel for Defendants is hereby granted leave to depose
Plaintiff at his place of confinement. Counsel for Defendants shall
arrange the time for the deposition.
8)
Plaintiff shall immediately notify the Court, in writing, of any
change in his mailing address and telephone number. Plaintiff's failure
Page 5 of 7
to notify the Court of a change in mailing address or phone number will
result in dismissal of this lawsuit, with prejudice.
9)
If a Defendants fails to sign and return a waiver of service to
the clerk within 30 days after the waiver is sent, the Court will take
appropriate steps to effect formal service through the U.S. Marshal's
service on that Defendant and will require that Defendant to pay the full
costs of formal service pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
4(d)(2).
10)
Within 10 days of receiving from Defendants' counsel an
authorization to release medical records, Plaintiff is directed to sign and
return the authorization to Defendants' counsel.
11)
If not already done, the clerk is directed to enter the
standard order directing Plaintiff to pay the filing fee or to file a
motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
12)
If Plaintiff files a motion to proceed in forma pauperis,
the clerk is directed to grant the motion and assess an initial partial
filing fee.
13)
The clerk is directed to attempt service on Defendants
pursuant to the standard procedures.
14)
The clerk is directed to email Plaintiff’s complaint and
this order to Attorney Doug Bitner.
Page 6 of 7
15)
The Clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified
protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act.
16)
By June 30, 2017, Defendants are directed to respond to
Plaintiff’s request in his complaint for a preliminary injunction.
ENTERED: June 6, 2017
FOR THE COURT:
s/Sue E. Myerscough
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 7 of 7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?