Barnes v. Hartshorn et al

Filing 29

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS entered by Chief Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 9/3/2010 27 Report and Recommendations, 23 Motion to Stay filed by Vermilion County Sheriff's Department, County of Vermilion Illinois, W Patrick Hartsho rn. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: (1) The Report and Recommendation 27 is accepted by this court. (2) Defendants' Motion to Stay and Compel Arbitration 23 is DENIED. (3) This case is referred to Judge Bernthal for further proceedings.(MT, ilcd)

Download PDF
Barnes v. Hartshorn et al Doc. 29 Friday, 03 September, 2010 01:55:13 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION ______________________________________________________________________________ RICK BARNES, Plaintiff, v. W. PATRICK HARTSHORN, in his capacity as Sheriff of Vermilion County, Illinois; COUNTY F VERMILION ILLINOIS, a body corporate and public, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER On July 15, 2010, Magistrate Judge David G. Bernthal filed a Report and Recommendation (#27) in this case. On July 30, 2010, Defendants, W. Patrick Hartshorn and County of Vermilion, filed their Objection to Report and Recommendation (#28). This court has conducted a careful and thorough de novo review of the Judge Bernthal's reasoning and Defendants' Objection. Following this review, this court agrees with and accepts Judge Bernthal's well-reasoned Report and Recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: (1) The Report and Recommendation (#27) is accepted by this court. (2) Defendants' Motion to Stay and Compel Arbitration (#23) is DENIED. (3) This case is referred to Judge Bernthal for further proceedings. ENTERED this 3rd day of September, 2010 s/ Michael P. McCuskey MICHAEL P. McCUSKEY CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE E-FILED Case No. 09-CV-2299 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?