Carty v. Illinois EPA et al

Filing 10

ORDER entered by Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 4/4/2012. The Report and Recommendation 9 is accepted by this court. Plaintiff's pro se complaint 1 is dismissed pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is terminated. See written order. Copy of order mailed to pro se plaintiff, Lawrence V Carty, 2906 Rachel Rd, Champaign, IL 61822. (DE, ilcd)

E-FILED

Wednesday, 04 April, 2012 10:49:59 AM
Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
URBANA DIVISION
______________________________________________________________________________
LAWRENCE V. CARTY,
Plaintiff,
v.
ILLINOIS EPA and DOUGLAS P. SCOTT,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 11-CV-2033

ORDER

A Report and Recommendation (#9) was filed by Magistrate Judge David G. Bernthal
in the above cause on March 15, 2012. More than fourteen (14) days have elapsed since the
filing of the Recommendation and no objections have been made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is, therefore, accepted by the court. See Video
Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd, 797 F.2d 538 (7th Cir. 1986).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
(1) The Report and Recommendation (#9) is accepted by this court.
(2) Plaintiff’s pro se Complaint (#1) is dismissed pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure.
(3) This case is terminated.
ENTERED this 4th day of April, 2012
s/ Michael P. McCuskey
MICHAEL P. McCUSKEY
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE