US Bank v Fed Ex Ground et al

Filing 51

ORDER entered by Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 1/3/2013. The Report and Recommendation 40 is accepted by this court. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 34 is GRANTED without prejudice as toCounts IX and X and DENIED as to Counts III, IV, VII and VIII. This case is referred to Judge Bernthal for further proceedings. See written order. (JMW, ilcd)

Download PDF
E-FILED Thursday, 03 January, 2013 01:58:07 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION ______________________________________________________________________________ U.S. BANK, as legal representative of the Estate of Martinez D. Jones, deceased, Plaintiff, v. FED EX GROUND PACKAGE SERVICE, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 12-CV-2084 ORDER A Report and Recommendation (#40) was filed by Magistrate Judge David G. Bernthal in the above cause on November 6, 2012. More than fourteen (14) days have elapsed since the filing of the Recommendation and no objections have been made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is, therefore, accepted by the court. See Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd, 797 F.2d 538 (7th Cir. 1986). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: (1) The Report and Recommendation (#40) is accepted by this court. (2) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (#34) is GRANTED without prejudice as to Counts IX and X and DENIED as to Counts III, IV, VII and VIII. (3) This case is referred to Judge Bernthal for further proceedings. ENTERED this 3rd day of January, 2013. s/MICHAEL P. McCUSKEY U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?