Seymour v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
21
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS entered by Judge Harold A Baker on 2/25/14. The Report and Recommendation 19 is accepted. The Motion for Summary Judgment 15 filed by Plaintiff is GRANTED. The Motion for Order Affirming the Commissioner's Decision 17 filed by Defendant is DENIED. This case is remanded pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 USC Sec 405(g). This case is terminated. See written Order. (TC, ilcd)
E-FILED
Tuesday, 25 February, 2014 03:47:53 PM
Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
______________________________________________________________________________
RYAN OWEN SEYMOUR,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 12-CV-2282
ORDER
A Report and Recommendation (#19) was filed by Magistrate Judge David G.
Bernthal in the above cause on February 3, 2014. More than fourteen (14) days have elapsed
since the filing of the Recommendation and no objections have been made. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1). The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is, therefore, accepted by the
court. See Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd, 797 F.2d 538 (7th Cir. 1986).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
(1)
The Report and Recommendation (#19) is accepted by this court.
(2)
The Motion for Summary Judgment (#15) filed by Plaintiff is GRANTED.
(3)
The Motion for Order Affirming the Commissioner’s Decision (#17) filed by
Defendant is DENIED.
(4)
This case is remanded pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for
further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation.
Furthermore, if it is determined that Plaintiff is disabled, the ALJ shall
expressly address the question of when that disability began.
(5)
This case is terminated.
ENTER this 25th day of February, 2014.
s/ Harold A. Baker
HAROLD A. BAKER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?