Castleberry v. Wexford Health Sources et al

Filing 12

MERIT REVIEW OPINION entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 4/27/16. Rule 16 Deadline 6/27/2016. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER. (FDT, ilcd)

E-FILED

Wednesday, 27 April, 2016 09:33:55 AM
Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
STEVEN CASTLEBERRY,
Plaintiff,
v.
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES,
INC.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

15-CV-2226

MERIT REVIEW OPINION
JAMES E. SHADID, U.S. District Judge.
Plaintiff proceeds pro se from his incarceration in Menard
Correctional Center. He alleges in his amended complaint that his
legs differ significantly in length, possibly due to a surgery or a
congenital condition, the Court infers from the medical records. In
any event, when Plaintiff was in Stateville Correctional Center he
allegedly received a crutch or cane, an orthotic shoe, and cortisone
shots, all of which helped his condition. He alleges that he was
refused these things after his transfer to Pontiac Correctional
Center, a refusal which allegedly continues at Menard Correctional
Center, even though the doctor at Menard sought approval from
Page 1 of 7 

Wexford Health Sources, Inc., for the orthotic shoe. Plaintiff further
alleges that he suffers “serious pain in his lower back, [right] hip
and both knees (bone-on-bone (serious)) . . . .” (Amended
Complaint p. 5.)(parentheticals in original).
At this early stage, Plaintiff states an arguable Eighth
Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to his serious medical
needs, though the standard of proof is high. A difference in medical
opinion is not enough to show deliberate indifference. Norfleet v.
Webster, 439 F.3d 392, 396, 396 (7th Cir. 2006)(“[A] difference of
opinion among physicians on how an inmate should be treated
cannot support a finding of deliberate indifference”). Deliberate
indifference is the conscious disregard of a known serious medical
need—treatment so subpar that it falls outside the entire range of
acceptable treatment plans. See Sain v. Wood, 512 F.3d 886, 894–
95 (7th Cir.2008)(Deliberate indifference can be inferred if a medical
professional's decisions are "'such a substantial departure from
accepted professional judgment, practice, or standards, as to
demonstrate that the person responsible actually did not base the
decision on such a judgment.'")(quoted cite omitted). At this point,
a more developed record is needed to make these determinations.
Page 2 of 7 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:
1)

Pursuant to its merit review of the Complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court finds that Plaintiff states an Eighth
Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to his serious medical
needs.

This case proceeds solely on the claims identified in this

paragraph. Any additional claims shall not be included in the
case, except at the Court’s discretion on motion by a party for good
cause shown or pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15.
2)

This case is now in the process of service. Plaintiff is

advised to wait until counsel has appeared for Defendants before
filing any motions, in order to give Defendants notice and an
opportunity to respond to those motions. Motions filed before
Defendants' counsel has filed an appearance will generally be
denied as premature. Plaintiff need not submit any evidence to the
Court at this time, unless otherwise directed by the Court.
3)

The Court will attempt service on Defendants by mailing

each Defendant a waiver of service. Defendants have 60 days from
the date the waiver is sent to file an Answer. If Defendants have not
filed Answers or appeared through counsel within 90 days of the
entry of this order, Plaintiff may file a motion requesting the status
Page 3 of 7 

of service. After Defendants have been served, the Court will enter
an order setting discovery and dispositive motion deadlines.
4)

With respect to a Defendant who no longer works at the

address provided by Plaintiff, the entity for whom that Defendant
worked while at that address shall provide to the Clerk said
Defendant's current work address, or, if not known, said
Defendant's forwarding address. This information shall be used
only for effectuating service. Documentation of forwarding
addresses shall be retained only by the Clerk and shall not be
maintained in the public docket nor disclosed by the Clerk.
5)

Defendants shall file an answer within 60 days of the

date the waiver is sent by the Clerk. A motion to dismiss is not an
answer. The answer should include all defenses appropriate under
the Federal Rules. The answer and subsequent pleadings shall be
to the issues and claims stated in this Opinion. In general, an
answer sets forth Defendants' positions. The Court does not rule
on the merits of those positions unless and until a motion is filed by
Defendants. Therefore, no response to the answer is necessary or
will be considered.

Page 4 of 7 

6)

This District uses electronic filing, which means that,

after Defense counsel has filed an appearance, Defense counsel will
automatically receive electronic notice of any motion or other paper
filed by Plaintiff with the Clerk. Plaintiff does not need to mail to
Defense counsel copies of motions and other papers that Plaintiff
has filed with the Clerk. However, this does not apply to discovery
requests and responses. Discovery requests and responses are not
filed with the Clerk. Plaintiff must mail his discovery requests and
responses directly to Defendants' counsel. Discovery requests or
responses sent to the Clerk will be returned unfiled, unless they are
attached to and the subject of a motion to compel. Discovery does
not begin until Defense counsel has filed an appearance and the
Court has entered a scheduling order, which will explain the
discovery process in more detail.
7)

Counsel for Defendants is hereby granted leave to depose

Plaintiff at his place of confinement. Counsel for Defendants shall
arrange the time for the deposition.
8)

Plaintiff shall immediately notify the Court, in writing, of

any change in his mailing address and telephone number.
Plaintiff's failure to notify the Court of a change in mailing address
Page 5 of 7 

or phone number will result in dismissal of this lawsuit, with
prejudice.
9)

If a Defendants fails to sign and return a waiver of service

to the clerk within 30 days after the waiver is sent, the Court will
take appropriate steps to effect formal service through the U.S.
Marshal's service on that Defendant and will require that Defendant
to pay the full costs of formal service pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 4(d)(2).
10)

Within 10 days of receiving from Defendants' counsel an

authorization to release medical records, Plaintiff is directed to sign
and return the authorization to Defendants' counsel.
11)

The clerk is directed to enter the standard order

granting Plaintiff's in forma pauperis petition and assessing an
initial partial filing fee, if not already done, and to attempt
service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures.
12)

The Clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified

protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability
and Accountability Act.
ENTERED: 04/27/2016
FOR THE COURT:
Page 6 of 7 

s/James E. Shadid
JAMES E. SHADID
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Page 7 of 7