Doss v. Kenco Logistic Services LLC

Filing 86

ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 5/23/17. The Report and Recommendation 82 is accepted by this court. Defendants' Motion for Rule 37 Sanctions 80 should be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff is hereby sanctioned &# 036;400, payment due on or before June 1, 2017, to be paid to Defendants Kenco Logistics Service and Kevin Walsh by sending a check or money order to Defendants' counsel of record. This case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. See written Order. (KM, ilcd)

Download PDF
E-FILED Tuesday, 23 May, 2017 12:18:28 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION ______________________________________________________________________________ NATHAN E. DOSS, Plaintiff, v. KENCO LOGISTIC SERVICES, LLC. et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 15-CV-2287 ORDER A Report and Recommendation (#82) was filed by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long in the above cause on May 5, 2017. On May 22, 2017, Plaintiff, Nathan E. Doss, filed his Objection to Report and Recommendations (#85). Following this court’s careful de novo review of the Magistrate Judge’s reasoning and Plaintiff’s Objection, this court agrees with and accepts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#82). This court agrees that Defendants’ Motion for Rule 37 Sanctions should be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: (1) The Report and Recommendation (#82) is accepted by this court. Defendants’ Motion for Rule 37 Sanctions (#80) should be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (2) Plaintiff is hereby sanctioned $400, payment due on or before June 1, 2017, to be paid to Defendants Kenco Logistics Service and Kevin Walsh by sending a check or money order to Defendants’ counsel of record. (3) This case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. ENTERED this 23rd day of May s/ COLIN S. BRUCE U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE , 2017.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?