Douglas v. Snieder et al
MERIT REVIEW OPINION - Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 9/15/2017. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint 10 is granted. Clerk is directed to docket the amended complaint attached to plaintiff's motion. The plainti ff's amended complaint is hereby dismissed with leave to plead over. The plaintiff may file an amended complaint, within thirty (30) days of this order, that identifies the jail officials responsible for the denial of medical treatment and stat es, with specificity, what adverse effects plaintiff suffered as a result of the delay in treatment. In short, plead more facts. If the plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint or follow the court's specific instructions, as outlined in this order, his case may be dismissed. Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a blank complaint form to assist him. (LN, ilcd)
Friday, 15 September, 2017 11:48:43 AM
Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
THOMAS SNIEDER, et al.
MERIT REVIEW ORDER #2
This case is before the court for a merit review of the plaintiff's
amended complaint. The court is required by 28 U.S.C. §1915A to
“screen” the plaintiff’s complaint, and through such process to
identify and dismiss any legally insufficient claim, or the entire
action if warranted. A claim is legally insufficient if it “(1) is
frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may
be granted; or (2) seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is
immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. §1915A.
In reviewing the complaint, the Court accepts the factual
allegations as true, liberally construing them in the plaintiff’s favor.
Turley v. Rednour, 729 F.3d 645, 649 (7th Cir. 2013). However,
conclusory statements and labels are insufficient. Enough facts
must be provided to “state a claim for relief that is plausible on its
face.” Alexander v. U.S., 721 F.3d 418, 422 (7th Cir. 2013)(citation
Plaintiff alleges in his amended complaint that, while he was a
pretrial detainee at Macon County Jail, he was diagnosed with a
MRSA infection after complaining about a painful bump on his arm
for approximately two (2) weeks. Plaintiff alleges that he was placed
in quarantine for an unspecified period of time. Plaintiff also
alleges that jail officials were negligent because they allowed
another inmate with MRSA to work in the kitchen, and that jail
officials “don’t give [inmates] hygiene.”
Because Plaintiff was a pretrial detainee, his rights are derived
from the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Burton v. Downey, 805 F.3d 776, 784 (7th Cir. 2015) (citing Pittman
v. Cnty. of Madison, 746 F.3d 766, 775 (7th Cir. 2014)). To state a
claim, a plaintiff must allege that the prison official acted with
deliberate indifference to a serious medical need. Estelle v. Gamble,
429 U.S. 97, 105 (1976).
Plaintiff sufficiently alleges that he suffered from a serious
medical need. See King v. Kramer, 680 F.3d 1013, 1018 (7th Cir.
2012). Plaintiff, however, has not described the treatment he
received for his infection, other than that he was separated from
other inmates, presumably to prevent the spread of the infection.
Plaintiff may be able to state a claim, but he must provide more
information regarding the treatment he received leading up to his
diagnosis, and the treatment he received thereafter. For example,
plaintiff must describe which jail officials provided him medical
treatment, what they did, and what medications, if any, they
To provide this information, the Court will grant plaintiff leave
to file a second amended complaint.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:
1) Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint
(#10) is granted. Clerk is directed to docket the amended
complaint attached to plaintiff’s motion.
2) The plaintiff’s amended complaint is hereby dismissed with
leave to plead over. The plaintiff may file an amended
complaint, within thirty (30) days of this order, that identifies
the jail officials responsible for the denial of medical treatment
and states, with specificity, what adverse effects plaintiff
suffered as a result of the delay in treatment. In short, plead
more facts. If the plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint
or follow the court’s specific instructions, as outlined in this
order, his case may be dismissed.
3) Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a blank complaint form to
Entered this 15th day of September, 2017.
/s/Harold A. Baker
HAROLD A. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?