Lillard v City of Danville

Filing 13

ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 4/12/2017. The Report and Recommendation 12 is accepted by this court. This case is terminated for want of prosecution. All pending motions are denied as moot. See written Order. (DS, ilcd)

E-FILED

Wednesday, 12 April, 2017 10:25:35 AM
Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
URBANA DIVISION
______________________________________________________________________________
LATANA LILLARD,
v.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,

CITY OF DANVILLE,
Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-2015

ORDER
A Report and Recommendation (#12) was filed by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long
in the above cause on March 28, 2017. On that same date, a copy of the report was
mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney. Judge Long recommended that the case be dismissed for
want of prosecution. The parties were instructed to file any objections to the
recommendation within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the report.
They were also informed that a failure to object would constitute a waiver of objections
on appeal. See Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538, 539 (7th Cir. 1986). The
time to object has passed, and neither party has filed an objection with this court.
Therefore, following this court’s careful de novo review of the Report and
Recommendation and the reasons for it, this court agrees with and accepts Magistrate
Judge Long’s Report and Recommendation (#12). This court agrees that this case
should be dismissed for want of prosecution.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
(1) The Report and Recommendation (#12) is accepted by this court.
(2) This case is terminated for want of prosecution. All pending motions are
denied as moot.
ENTERED this 12th day of April, 2017

s/ COLIN S. BRUCE
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

2