Holmes v. Board of Education of Kankakee School District #111

Filing 28

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 4/10/19. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: The Report and Recommendation 24 is accepted by this court. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 17 is DENIED. Plaintiff's counsel is to be sanctioned in the amount of $1,000 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(f). SEE WRITTEN ORDER. (SKR, ilcd)

Download PDF
E-FILED Wednesday, 10 April, 2019 10:22:50 AM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION ______________________________________________________________________________ LORI HOLMES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Case No. 17-CV-2318 ) BOARD OF EDUCATION OF ) KANKAKEE SCHOOL DISTRICT ) #111, an Illinois Public School District, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER A Report and Recommendation (#24) was filed by the Magistrate Judge in the above cause on March 26, 2019. More than fourteen (14) days have elapsed since the filing of the Recommendation and no objections have been made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is, therefore, accepted by the court. See Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd, 797 F.2d 538 (7th Cir. 1986). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: (1) The Report and Recommendation (#24) is accepted by this court. (2) Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (#17) is DENIED. (3) Plaintiff’s counsel is to be sanctioned in the amount of $1,000 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(f) for her failure to follow the Court’s discovery schedule and for her failure to adequately meet and confer pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2)(A). As stated in Judge Long’s text order of April 9, 2019, Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order (#21) is DENIED AS MOOT. (4) This case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. ENTERED this 10th day of April, 2019. s/ COLIN S. BRUCE U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?