Martin v. Washington Post Company et al

Filing 6

NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Thomas W Kelty on behalf of Montgomery County Maryland (Kelty, Thomas)

Download PDF
Martin v. Washington Post Company et al Doc. 6 3:09-cv-03295-JES-CHE # 6 Page 1 of 3 Monday, 21 December, 2009 01:45:42 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANDY MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON POST COMPANY, DANIEL MORSE, SCOTT SHIRLEY d/b/a/ ADR PRODUCTIONS, GOOGLE , INC., JOHN GILCHRIST, A/K/A JOHN BORLAZA, JIM BROSEMER, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, JOHN J. MCCARTHY, JOHN DOE AGENT OF MARK KIRK and/or BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, WILLIAM G. SIMMONS, EUGENE WOLFE, and CHERYL MCCALLY, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:09-cv-03295-JES-BGC ) ) Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) E-FILED ENTRY OF APPEARANCE NOW COMES Thomas W. Kelty, Kelty Law Office, and enters his appearance as attorney for MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, a Defendant, in the above-styled cause of action, and states he is in good standing with this Court (L.R. 83.5(f)), and is the lead counsel for Montgomery County, Maryland (L.R. 11.2). Respectfully submitted, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, Defendant /s/ Thomas W. Kelty It's Attorney Thomas W. Kelty, No. 1441337 Kelty Law Office Attorney for Defendant H:\Montgomery County/Entry of Appearance.wpd.\12-21-2009 -1- 3:09-cv-03295-JES-CHE # 6 Page 2 of 3 Montgomery County, Maryland P.O. Box 2243 Springfield, IL 62705 Telephone: 217/789-8901 H:\Montgomery County/Entry of Appearance.wpd.\12-21-2009 -2- 3:09-cv-03295-JES-CHE # 6 Page 3 of 3 STATE OF ILLINOIS COUNTY OF SANGAMON ) ) ) SS. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that the above instrument was filed electronically with the Court on December 21, 2009. /s/ Thomas W. Kelty H:\Montgomery County/Entry of Appearance.wpd.\12-21-2009 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?