Illinois State Employee Association Local 2002, etc. v. Quinn et al

Filing 5

OPINION (See Written Opinion): The Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (d/e 4 ) is DISMISSED for want of prosecution. This case is CLOSED. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 07/10/2012. (VM, ilcd)

E-FILED

Tuesday, 10 July, 2012 10:40:44 AM
Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
SPRINGFIELD DIVISION
ILLINOIS STATE EMPLOYEES
ASSOCIATION LOCAL 2002, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
QUINN, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 11-03208

OPINION
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. District Judge:
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint (d/e 4),
which Plaintiffs filed on September 20, 2011. On May 22, 2012, this Court noted
that Plaintiffs had failed to serve Defendants within 120 days after filing the
Amended Complaint, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). See
Text Order of May 22, 2012. This Court directed Plaintiffs to file a status report
by June 1, 2012, to show why this case should not be dismissed for want of
prosecution. See Text Order of May 22, 2012.
To date, Plaintiffs have not filed a status report and have not served
Defendants. Therefore, Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint (d/e 4) is DISMISSED for
want of prosecution. This case is CLOSED.
Page 1 of 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.
ENTERED: July 10, 2012
FOR THE COURT:
s/ Sue E. Myerscough
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH
UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE

Page 2 of 2