Wyatt v. Illinois State Police Department et al
Filing
5
OPINION: The Report and Recommendation (d/e 4 ) is ACCEPTED by this Court. Plaintiff's Complaint (d/e 1 ) is DISMISSED for want of prosecution. Plaintiff's Application (d/e 2 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 2/12/2013. (MJ, ilcd)
E-FILED
Tuesday, 12 February, 2013 02:58:20 PM
Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
SPRINGFIELD DIVISION
ANTHONY LATEE WYATT,
Plaintiff,
v.
ILLINOIS STATE POLICE
DEPARTMENT, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 12-3355
OPINION
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. District Judge:
On January 2, 2013, Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore entered
an order directing Plaintiff to file a complete complaint setting forth all of
his claims and to file it as his “First Amended Complaint.” See d/e 3.
Magistrate Judge Cudmore also directed Plaintiff to supplement his
Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or
Costs (Application) (d/e 2) since Plaintiff had not provided any of his
financial information. Plaintiff has neither filed his First Amended
Complaint or supplemented his Application as ordered by Judge
Page 1 of 3
Cudmore.
This matter is now before the Court on the Report and
Recommendation (d/e 4) entered by Magistrate Judge Cudmore on
January 25, 2013, recommending that this Court dismiss Plaintiff’s
Complaint (d/e 1) for want of prosecution. Neither party filed an
objection to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days
of the entry of the Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1). Thus, this Court accepts the Report and Recommendation.
See Schur v. L.A. Weight Loss Centers, Inc., 577 F.3d 752, 760 (7th Cir.
2009) (“If no party objects to the magistrate judge’s action, the district
judge may simply accept it.”)
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
(1) The Report and Recommendation (d/e 4) is ACCEPTED by this
Court;
(2) Plaintiff’s Complaint (d/e 1) is DISMISSED for want of
prosecution.
(3) Plaintiff’s Application (d/e 2) is DENIED AS MOOT.
Page 2 of 3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ENTERED: February 12, 2013
FOR THE COURT:
s/ Sue E. Myerscough
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH
UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?