Sanson v. Carson Smithfield LLC

Filing 7

ORDER (See Written Order): IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:(1) The Report and Recommendation (d/e 6 ) is ACCEPTED by this Court;(2) Plaintiffs Complaint (d/e 1 ) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for want of prosecution. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 8/11/2014. (VM, ilcd)

E-FILED

Monday, 11 August, 2014 01:16:00 PM
Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
SPRINGFIELD DIVISION
TROY SANSON,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
CARSON SMITHFIELD LLC,
Defendant.

No. 14-cv-03024

ORDER
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE:
This matter is before the Court on the Report and
Recommendation (d/e 6) entered by Magistrate Judge Tom
Schanzle-Haskins on July 16, 2014, recommending that this Court
dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (d/e 1) for want of prosecution. Neither
party filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation within
fourteen (14) days of the entry of the Report and Recommendation.
See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, this Court accepts the Report
and Recommendation. See Schur v. L.A. Weight Loss Centers, Inc.,
577 F.3d 752, 760 (7th Cir. 2009) (“If no party objects to the
magistrate judge’s action, the district judge may simply accept it.”)

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
(1) The Report and Recommendation (d/e 6) is ACCEPTED by
this Court;
(2) Plaintiff’s Complaint (d/e 1) is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE for want of prosecution.

This case is CLOSED
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ENTERED: August 11, 2014
/s Sue E. Myerscough
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Page 2 of 2