Gipson v. Commissioner of Social Security
ORDER entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 12/4/17. The Report and Recommendation, d/e 15 is ADOPTED in its entirety. The Defendant's Motion for Summary Affirmance, d/e 13 is GRANTED and, the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, d/e 10 is DENIED. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. This case is CLOSED. (MAS, ilcd)
Tuesday, 05 December, 2017 01:55:38 PM
Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. District Judge:
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Tom SchanzleHaskins (d/e 15). Judge Schanzle-Haskins recommends that this
Court GRANT Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s Motion
for Summary Affirmance (d/e 13), DENY Plaintiff Floyd Gipson’s
Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 10), and affirm the decision of
the Defendant Commissioner.
Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due on or
before November 30, 2017. Neither party filed objections.
Page 1 of 3
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3), the Court
Amay accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive
further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with
instructions.@ Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court reviews de novo
any part of the Report and Recommendation to which a proper
objection has been made. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). AIf no objection
or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews
those unobjected portions for clear error.@ Johnson v. Zema Sys.
Corp., 170 F. 3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999) (also noting that a party
who fails to object to the report and recommendation waives
appellate review of the factual and legal questions).
Judge Schanzle-Haskins found the Administrative Law
Judge’s decision was supported by substantial evidence. Judge
Schanzle-Haskins addressed each of the issues raised by Plaintiff in
his memorandum in support of his Motion for Summary Judgment
(d/e 11). After reviewing the record, the Report and
Recommendation, the parties’ Motions and memoranda, as well as
the applicable law, this Court finds no clear error.
Page 2 of 3
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
The Report and Recommendation (d/e 15) is
ADOPTED in its entirety.
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Affirmance (d/e 13)
is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e
10) is DENIED.
The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.
This case is CLOSED.
ENTERED: December 4, 2017.
FOR THE COURT:
s/ Sue E. Myerscough
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?