Danetti v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 19

OPINION: Joint Motion for Remand and for Further Proceedings Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (d/e18) is ALLOWED. The decision of the Commissioner is reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (SEE WRITTEN OPINION.) Entered by Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins on 12/6/2017. (GL, ilcd)

Download PDF
E-FILED Wednesday, 06 December, 2017 03:41:04 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION ANGELLA M. DANETTI, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 17-3058 OPINION TOM SCHANZLE-HASKINS, U.S. Magistrate Judge: This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for Remand and for Further Proceedings Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (d/e18) (Motion). The parties consented to proceed before this Court. Consent to the Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge and Reference Order entered August 22, 2017 (d/e 16). The Motion Court will allow the Motion. THEREFORE, Joint Motion for Remand and for Further Proceedings Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (d/e18) is ALLOWED. The decision of the Commissioner is reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) will reconsider the mental health evidence, reconsider the weighing Page 1 of 2 of the opinions of Drs. Singh and Reddy, and further consider Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity. The ALJ will then reevaluate Plaintiff’s ability to return to her past relevant work and, if warranted, perform other jobs in the national economy. All pending motions before this Court are denied as moot. This case is closed before this Court. ENTER: December 6, 2017 s/ Tom Schanzle-Haskins UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?