Danetti v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
19
OPINION: Joint Motion for Remand and for Further Proceedings Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (d/e18) is ALLOWED. The decision of the Commissioner is reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (SEE WRITTEN OPINION.) Entered by Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins on 12/6/2017. (GL, ilcd)
E-FILED
Wednesday, 06 December, 2017 03:41:04 PM
Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION
ANGELLA M. DANETTI,
Plaintiff,
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner
of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 17-3058
OPINION
TOM SCHANZLE-HASKINS, U.S. Magistrate Judge:
This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for
Remand and for Further Proceedings Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42
U.S.C. § 405(g) (d/e18) (Motion). The parties consented to proceed before
this Court. Consent to the Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States
Magistrate Judge and Reference Order entered August 22, 2017 (d/e 16).
The Motion Court will allow the Motion.
THEREFORE, Joint Motion for Remand and for Further Proceedings
Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (d/e18) is ALLOWED.
The decision of the Commissioner is reversed and remanded pursuant to
sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, Administrative Law Judge
(ALJ) will reconsider the mental health evidence, reconsider the weighing
Page 1 of 2
of the opinions of Drs. Singh and Reddy, and further consider Plaintiff’s
residual functional capacity. The ALJ will then reevaluate Plaintiff’s ability to
return to her past relevant work and, if warranted, perform other jobs in the
national economy. All pending motions before this Court are denied as
moot. This case is closed before this Court.
ENTER: December 6, 2017
s/ Tom Schanzle-Haskins
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?