Martin v. JMF Manufacturing, LLC
Filing
23
ORDER & OPINION entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 5/11/2011: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) provides that an action may be dismissed at Plaintiffs request upon terms that the Court considers proper. As the parties have reported that the case is settled, the Court sees no reason why it is notproper to grant Plaintiffs request. Accordingly, Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Doc. 22 is GRANTED, and this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. CASE TERMINATED.
E-FILED
Wednesday, 11 May, 2011 11:32:40 AM
Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
ROCK ISLAND DIVISION
WILLIAM G. MARTIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
JMF MANUFACTURING, LLC, d/b/a
JMF COMPANY,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.
08-cv-4060
ORDER & OPINION
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 22). On April 14, 2011,
the parties reached a settlement agreement during a settlement conference with
Magistrate Judge Gorman. (Minute Entry of 4/14/2011). On that date, Magistrate
Judge Gorman entered an order directing the parties to file, within 35 days, a
stipulation of dismissal or other appropriate pleading. (Doc. 21). In compliance
with Judge Gorman’s Agreed Order of Dismissal, Plaintiff has now filed his Motion
to Dismiss, in which he reports that all matters in this controversy have been
settled and asks that the case be dismissed with prejudice.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) provides that an action may be
dismissed at Plaintiff’s request upon terms that the Court considers proper. As the
parties have reported that the case is settled, the Court sees no reason why it is not
proper to grant Plaintiff’s request. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc.
22) is GRANTED, and this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO
ORDERED.
CASE TERMINATED.
Entered this 11th day of May, 2011.
s/ Joe B. McDade
JOE BILLY McDADE
United States Senior District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?