Langfeldt-Abbott v. McHugh

Filing 80

ORDER: Plaintiff is reminded that on August 23, 2016 Judge Sara L. Darrow entered an Order consolidating case numbers 12-4117 and 14-4104 and directed that all future pleadings be filed in the lead case, 12-4117. The [#31 in 14-4104] Amended Complain t and [#32 in 14-4104] Reply to response to Motion filed in case 14-4104 are to be stricken by the Clerk. Plaintiff may refile the Amended Complaint in the lead case, 12-4117. The Court notes that the [#32 in 14-4104] Reply was filed after the Court had already ruled upon the underlying motion. Additionally, pursuant to local rule 7.1(B)(3) replies are not permitted without leave of court, which the Plaintiff did not seek before filing the Reply. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 9/12/16. (WG, ilcd)

Download PDF
E-FILED Monday, 12 September, 2016 03:50:08 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ROCK ISLAND DIVISION SHEILA LANGELDT-ABBOTT, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 4:12-cv-4117-SLD-JEH JOHN McHUGH, Defendant. Order Plaintiff is reminded that on August 23, 2016 Judge Sara L. Darrow entered an Order consolidating case numbers 12-4117 and 14-4104 and directed that all future pleadings be filed in the lead case, 12-4117. The [#31 in 14-4104] Amended Complaint and [#32 in 14-4104] Reply to response to Motion filed in case 14-4104 are to be stricken by the Clerk. Plaintiff may refile the Amended Complaint in the lead case, 12-4117. The Court notes that the [#32 in 14-4104] Reply was filed after the Court had already ruled upon the underlying motion. Additionally, pursuant to local rule 7.1(B)(3) replies are not permitted without leave of court, which the Plaintiff did not seek before filing the Reply. It is so ordered. Entered on September 12, 2016. s/Jonathan E. Hawley U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?