Burroughs v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 17

ORDER: Written Order attached. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 9/8/2014. (KZ, ilcd)

Download PDF
E-FILED Monday, 08 September, 2014 11:20:26 AM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ROCK ISLAND DIVISION RAQUEL BURROUGHS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 4:13-cv-04026-JEH CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Order This matter is now before the Court on the parties’ Stipulation for Remand Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (Doc. 16). In their Stipulation, the parties jointly request that the Court reverse this case and remand for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 USC § 405(g), which authorizes the Court “to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.” 42 USC § 405(g). The parties stipulate that upon remand, the Administrative Law Judge will be directed to: 1) reevaluate the medical opinions of record, including those of the State agency psychological consultants, and give reasons for the weight assigned; 2) reassess Ms. Burroughs’s residual functional capacity and subjective complaints; and 3) if warranted, obtain supplemental evidence from a vocational expert at step five. The Court finds the request for remand appropriate and so the Stipulation for Remand Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (Doc. 16) is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Commissioner’s decision in this matter is REVERSED and the 1 case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for a new hearing pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 USC § 405(g). The Clerk’s Office is hereby directed to enter Judgment in favor of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant. This matter is now terminated. Entered on September 8, 2014. s/Jonathan E. Hawley U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?