Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
17
ORDER entered by Judge Sara Darrow on March 12, 2015, ADOPTING the 16 Report and Recommendation. Defendant's 13 Motion for Summary Affirmance is GRANTED. Plaintiff's 10 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. (BRP, ilcd)
E-FILED
Thursday, 12 March, 2015 09:35:10 AM
Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
ROCK ISLAND DIVISION
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
JANIS MARIE JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
Case No. 4:13-cv-04100-SLD-JEH
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 16, of
United States Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley. Judge Hawley recommends that this Court
affirm the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. The Commissioner determined that
Plaintiff Janis Marie Johnson was not disabled and, therefore, denied Plaintiff’s application for
Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits.
Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due on or before March 6,
2015. Neither party has filed objections. This Court reviews findings of the Report and
Recommendation to which no objection has been made for clear error. Johnson v. Zema Sys.
Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999) (noting in addition that a party who fails to object to the
report and recommendation waives appellate review of factual and legal questions).
After reviewing the record, the Report and Recommendation, the parties’ Motions and
memorandum, as well as the applicable law, this Court finds no clear error.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 16, is ADOPTED in its entirety.
1
2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Affirmance, ECF No. 13, is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s
Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 10, is DENIED. THIS CASE IS CLOSED.
Entered this 12th day of March, 2015.
s/ Sara Darrow
SARA DARROW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?