Rudy-Palos v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 25

ORDER granting 23 the Plaintiff's Motion for EAJA Fees. See written Order. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 11/14/2017. (KZ, ilcd)

Download PDF
E-FILED Tuesday, 14 November, 2017 02:58:49 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ROCK ISLAND DIVISION ROBIN RUDY-PALOS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 4:16-cv-04081-JEH COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Order The Court has reviewed the Plaintiff’s Motion for EAJA Fees (Doc. 23) to which the Defendant has no opposition. The Court therefore GRANTS the Motion and awards the Plaintiff, Robin Rudy-Palos, $3,123.75 (three thousand one hundred twenty three dollars and seventy five cents) for attorney fees and $0 (zero dollars) for costs in full satisfaction of any and all claims the Plaintiff may have under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The award fully and completely satisfies any and all claims for attorney fees, expenses, and costs that may be payable to the Plaintiff in this matter under the EAJA. Any fees paid belong to the Plaintiff and not her attorney. The fees can be offset to satisfy any pre-existing debt that the Plaintiff owes the United States. Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 589 (2010). If the Defendant can verify that the Plaintiff does not owe pre-existing debt to the government subject to offset, the Defendant will direct payment of the award to the Plaintiff’s attorney pursuant to any EAJA assignment that was previously executed between the Plaintiff and her attorney. It is so ordered. Entered on November 14, 2017. s/Jonathan E. Hawley U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?