Powers v. Aramark Corporation et al

Filing 8

MERIT REVIEW OPINION - Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 1/3/2017. (Rule 16 Deadline 3/6/2017.) The clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The clerk is directed to attempt service on the defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 4 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion to request counsel 3 is denied, with leave to renew upon demonstrat ing that he made attempts to hire his own counsel. Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). This typically requires writing to several lawyers and attaching the responses. If Plaintiff renews his motion, he should set forth how far he has gone in school, any jobs he has held inside and outside of prison, any classes he has taken in prison, and any prior litigation experience he has. (LN, ilcd)

E-FILED

Tuesday, 03 January, 2017 12:04:11 PM
Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
THOMAS POWERS,
Plaintiff,
v.
ARAMARK CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

16-4244

MERIT REVIEW AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
The plaintiff, proceeding pro se, a civil detainee at the Rushville Treatment and
Detention Facility (“Rushville”) is requesting leave to proceed under a reduced
payment procedure for indigent plaintiffs who are institutionalized but are not
prisoners as defined in 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(h).
The “privilege to proceed without posting security for costs and fees is reserved
to the many truly impoverished litigants who, within the District Court’s sound
discretion, would remain without legal remedy if such privilege were not afforded to
them.” Brewster v. North Am. Van Lines, Inc., 461 F.2d 649, 651 (7th Circ. 1972).
Additionally, a court must dismiss cases proceeding in forma pauperis “at any time” if
the action is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim, even if part of the filing fee has
been paid. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d)(2). Accordingly, this court grants leave to proceed in
forma pauperis only if the complaint states a federal action.
In reviewing the Complaint, the Court accepts the factual allegations as true,
liberally construing them in the plaintiff's favor. Turley v. Rednour, 729 F.3d 645, 649 (7th
Cir. 2013). The Court has reviewed the Complaint and has also held a merit review
hearing in order to give the plaintiff a chance to personally explain his claims to the
Court.
The plaintiff filed this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that he is a
member of the Messianic Hebrew/Messianic Judaism faith. He alleges that his
religious beliefs require that he observe the Sabbath (a weekly day of rest between
sundown Friday and sundown Saturday) and eat Kosher meals. The plaintiff alleges
that the defendants terminated his employment because he would not work during the
Sabbath, that the defendants refused to accommodate his requests to be provided a
cooler full of food every Friday, and that he is not being provided with a Kosher diet.

Page 1 of 3

The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”) prohibits
government officials from placing a substantial burden upon an incarcerated person’s
exercise of sincerely held religious beliefs. 42 U.S.C. §§ n2000cc-1(a)-(b). Plaintiff’s
allegations support a plausible claim that TDF officials have violated his rights under
RLUIPA.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:
1.
Pursuant to its merit review of the Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the
Court finds that the plaintiff states a claim in violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the
First Amendment and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act
(RLUIPA), 42 U.S.C. ' 2000cc-1 against the named defendants. Any additional claims
shall not be included in the case, except at the Court’s discretion on motion by a party
for good cause shown or pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15.
2.
This case is now in the process of service. The plaintiff is advised to wait
until counsel has appeared for the defendants before filing any motions, in order to give
the defendants notice and an opportunity to respond to those motions. Motions filed
before defendants' counsel has filed an appearance will generally be denied as
premature. The plaintiff need not submit any evidence to the Court at this time, unless
otherwise directed by the Court.
3.
The Court will attempt service on the defendants by mailing each
defendant a waiver of service. The defendants have 60 days from the date the waiver is
sent to file an answer. If the defendants have not filed answers or appeared through
counsel within 90 days of the entry of this order, the plaintiff may file a motion
requesting the status of service. After the defendants have been served, the Court will
enter an order setting discovery and dispositive motion deadlines.
4.
With respect to a defendant who no longer works at the address provided
by the plaintiff, the entity for whom that defendant worked while at that address shall
provide to the Clerk said defendant's current work address, or, if not known, said
defendant's forwarding address. This information shall be used only for effectuating
service. Documentation of forwarding addresses shall be retained only by the Clerk
and shall not be maintained in the public docket nor disclosed by the Clerk.
5.
The defendants shall file an answer within 60 days of the date the waiver
is sent by the Clerk. A motion to dismiss is not an answer. The answer should include
all defenses appropriate under the Federal Rules. The answer and subsequent
pleadings shall be to the issues and claims stated in this opinion. In general, an answer
sets forth the defendants' positions. The Court does not rule on the merits of those

Page 2 of 3

positions unless and until a motion is filed by the defendants. Therefore, no response to
the answer is necessary or will be considered.
6.
This district uses electronic filing, which means that, after defense counsel
has filed an appearance, defense counsel will automatically receive electronic notice of
any motion or other paper filed by the plaintiff with the Clerk. The plaintiff does not
need to mail to defense counsel copies of motions and other papers that the plaintiff has
filed with the Clerk. However, this does not apply to discovery requests and responses.
Discovery requests and responses are not filed with the Clerk. The plaintiff must mail
his discovery requests and responses directly to defendants' counsel. Discovery
requests or responses sent to the Clerk will be returned unfiled, unless they are attached
to and the subject of a motion to compel. Discovery does not begin until defense
counsel has filed an appearance and the Court has entered a scheduling order, which
will explain the discovery process in more detail.
7.
Counsel for the defendants is hereby granted leave to depose the plaintiff
at his place of confinement. Counsel for the defendants shall arrange the time for the
deposition.
8.
The plaintiff shall immediately notify the Court, in writing, of any change
in his mailing address and telephone number. The plaintiff's failure to notify the Court
of a change in mailing address or phone number will result in dismissal of this lawsuit,
with prejudice.
9.
If a defendant fails to sign and return a waiver of service to the clerk
within 30 days after the waiver is sent, the Court will take appropriate steps to effect
formal service through the U.S. Marshals service on that defendant and will require that
defendant to pay the full costs of formal service pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 4(d)(2).
10.
The clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order
pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.
11.
The clerk is directed to attempt service on the defendants pursuant to the
standard procedures.
12.

Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (#4) is GRANTED.

Page 3 of 3

13.
Plaintiff’s motion to request counsel (#3) is denied, , with leave to renew
upon demonstrating that he made attempts to hire his own counsel. Pruitt v. Mote, 503
F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). This typically requires writing to several lawyers and
attaching the responses. If Plaintiff renews his motion, he should set forth how far he
has gone in school, any jobs he has held inside and outside of prison, any classes he has
taken in prison, and any prior litigation experience he has.
Entered this 3rd day of January, 2017
/s/ Harold A. Baker
HAROLD A. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Page 4 of 3