Kreider v. Generations at Rock Island, LLC
Filing
3
ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 6/12/2017. The Court may grant leave to amend defective allegations of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1653. See also, Leaf v. Supreme Court of State of Wis., 979 F.2d 5 89, 595 (7th Cir. 1992) ("leave to amend defective allegations of subject matter jurisdiction should be freely given") (citations omitted). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff file an Amended Complaint not later than fourteen (14) days (6/27/2017) from the date of entry of this Order. In the Amended Complaint, the Plaintiff shall properly allege the basis for the Court's jurisdiction. See full written Order. (RT, ilcd).
E-FILED
Monday, 12 June, 2017 04:54:49 PM
Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD
IN THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
ROCK ISLAND DIVISION
VERNON KREIDER, individually
and as SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE
of the ESTATE of PATRICIA
KREIDER, deceased,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 4:17-cv-04152-SLD-JEH
v.
GENERATIONS at ROCK ISLAND,
LLC, d/b/a ROCK ISLAND
NURSING & REHAB CENTER,
Defendant.
Order
The Plaintiff, Vernon Kreider, as Special Representative of the Estate of
Patricia Kreider, deceased, filed a Complaint on June 9, 2017 against the
Defendant, Generations of Rock Island, LLC d/b/a Rock Island Nursing & Rehab
Center. (D. 1). 1 The Plaintiff’s Complaint asserts diversity of citizenship as a basis
of this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction. Id. at pg. 2. The allegations of the
Complaint are not sufficient to support that assertion.
The court may sua sponte raise the issue of federal subject matter jurisdiction.
Tylka v. Gerber Products Co., 211 F.3d 445, 447 (7th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted).
Citizenship for diversity purposes of a limited liability company is the citizenship
of each of its members. Wise v. Wachovia Securities, LLC, 450 F.3d 265, 267 (7th Cir.
2006). The Plaintiff’s complaint does not identify the members of the Defendant
1
Citations to the Docket in this case are abbreviated as “D. __.”
1
LLC or allege the citizenship of those members.
Therefore, the Plaintiff’s
complaint is not sufficient to invoke diversity jurisdiction.
Additionally, asserting jurisdiction on the basis of “information and belief”
is insufficient to invoke diversity jurisdiction. America’s Best Inns, Inc. v. Best Inns
of Abilene, L.P., 980 F.2d 1072, 1074 (7th Cir. 1992) (“to the best of my knowledge
and belief” is insufficient to invoke diversity jurisdiction); Page v. Wright, 116 F.2d
449, 451 (7th Cir. 1940) (expressing serious doubts as to whether the record could
be sustained in the face of a direct jurisdictional attack where diversity jurisdiction
was asserted, in part, based upon information and belief). The Plaintiff asserts
some of the basis for the Court’s jurisdiction “[u]pon information and belief[.]” (D.
1 at pg. 2). Therefore, the Plaintiff’s Complaint is not sufficient to invoke diversity
jurisdiction.
The Court may grant leave to amend defective allegations of subject matter
jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1653. See also, Leaf v. Supreme Court of State of
Wis., 979 F.2d 589, 595 (7th Cir. 1992) (“leave to amend defective allegations of
subject matter jurisdiction should be freely given”) (citations omitted).
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff file an Amended Complaint
not later than fourteen (14) days from the date of entry of this Order. In the
Amended Complaint, the Plaintiff shall properly allege the basis for the Court’s
jurisdiction.
It is so ordered.
Entered on June 12, 2017.
s/Jonathan E. Hawley
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?