Sec, et al v. Kimmes, et al
Filing
983
MEMORANDUM Order:Accordingly this Court grants the SEC's motion for an extension to April 28, 2016. 979 If by that time Quinn has executed the documents that have been tendered by the SEC for his signature, this Court will carry out its earlier-stated intention. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 4/22/2016:Mailed notice(srn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
THOMAS F. QUINN,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 89 C 5942
MEMORANDUM ORDER
At the time of the April 21 telephonic status hearing in this action, it appeared from the
oral presentation by counsel for the SEC that there were good many complexities to be
overcome -- and consequently a substantial amount of time would be required -- for Thomas
Quinn ("Quinn") to transfer effectively all of his right, title and interest (in whatever legal form)
in the French Chateau that is the only remaining property of any substance potentially available
toward carrying out the basic purposes for which this action was originally brought and for
which it has been pursued. But later on the same day SEC counsel has delivered a Status Report
and Motion To Continue accompanied by exhibits that tell a different story, one under which no
more than a limited group of documents that are now available for signature need to be executed
by Quinn before this Court's stated intention to release him from custody under the currently
ongoing civil contempt proceedings can be effectuated.
Accordingly this Court grants the SEC's motion for an extension to April 28, 2016. If by
that time Quinn has executed the documents that have been tendered by the SEC for his
signature, this Court will carry out its earlier-stated intention.
__________________________________________
Milton I. Shadur
Senior United States District Judge
Date: April 22, 2016
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?