Jaffe v. Household Intl Inc, et al

Filing 1596

MOTION by Unknown Gary Gilmer, Defendants Household International Inc., W F Aldinger, D A Schoenhold for judgment // Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 60 (a) After the close of Evidence (Kavaler, Thomas)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) LAWRENCE E. JAFFE PENSION PLAN, ON) BEHALF OF ITSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY) SITUATED, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) - against ) ) HOUSEHOLD INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL., ) ) Defendants. ) ) Lead Case No. 02-C5893 (Consolidated) CLASS ACTION Judge Ronald A. Guzmán DEFENDANTS' RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 50(a) AFTER THE CLOSE OF EVIDENCE Defendants Household International, Inc. and its former officers and directors William F. Aldinger, David A. Schoenholz and Gary Gilmer (collectively, "Defendants") hereby move pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(a) for an Order granting Defendants Judgment as a Matter of Law After The Close of Evidence for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum of Law and Defendants' April 22, 2009 Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Pursuant to Rule 50(a) After Plaintiffs Have Been Fully Heard (Dkt. 1567), incorporated by reference therein. Dated: April 29, 2009 Respectfully submitted, CAHILL GORDON & REINDEL LLP By: /s/ Thomas J. Kavaler Thomas J. Kavaler Bar No. 1269927 Howard G. Sloane Bar No. 1197391 Patricia Farren Bar No. 1198498 -2Susan Buckley Bar No. 1198696 Landis C. Best David R. Owen 80 Pine Street New York, New York 10005 (212) 701-3000 - andEIMER STAHL KLEVORN & SOLBERG LLP 224 South Michigan Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60604 (312) 660-7600 Attorneys for Defendants Household International, Inc., William F. Aldinger, David A. Schoenholz and Gary Gilmer

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?