George S May Intl, et al v. Xcentric Ventures, et al
Filing
182
MINUTE entry before Judge Charles R. Norgle Sr.: Motion hearing held on 11/3/2006 regarding motion for partial summary judgment 175 and motion for sanctions 176 . Reply to response to motion for sanctions is due on or before 11/13/2006. Response to motion for partial summary judgment is due by 11/27/2006. Defendant's reply is due by 12/11/2006. Status hearing set for 2/8/2007 at 09:30 AM. Mailed notice (ewf, )
George S May Intl, et al v. Xcentric Ventures, et al
Doc. 18
Case 1:04-cv-06018
Document 182
Filed 11/03/2006
Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE Northern District of Illinois - CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 2.5 Eastern Division George S. May International Company Plaintiff, v. Xcentric Vventures, LLC, et al. Defendant. Case No.: 1:04-cv-06018 Hon. Charles R. Norgle Sr
NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY
This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, November 3, 2006: MINUTE entry before Judge Charles R. Norgle Sr.: Motion hearing held on 11/3/2006 regarding motion for partial summary judgment[175] and motion for sanctions[176]. Reply to response to motion for sanctions is due on or before 11/13/2006. Response to motion for partial summary judgment is due by 11/27/2006. Defendant's reply is due by 12/11/2006. Status hearing set for 2/8/2007 at 09:30 AM. Mailed notice(ewf, )
ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please refer to it for additional information. For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?