EEOC v. Sidley Austin Brown.

Filing 60

MOTION by Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for order deeming matters admitted, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 36 (Mulaire, Justin)

Download PDF
EEOC v. Sidley Austin Brown. Doc. 60 Case 1:05-cv-00208 Document 60 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD, ) ) Defendant. ) ________________________________________________) Civil No. 05 cv 0208 Judge Zagel Magistrate Ashman PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DETERMINE THE SUFFICIENCY OF RESPONSES TO REQUESTS TO ADMIT FACTS Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 36(a), Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") hereby moves to determine the sufficiency of Defendant Sidley Austin Brown & Wood's ("Sidley") Amended and Supplemental Responses to EEOC's October 3, 2005 Requests to Admit Facts, stating as follows: 1. Admissions. 2. Admissions. 3. On March 22, 2006, Sidley served EEOC with Amended and Supplemental Sidley responded on November 16, 2005 to EEOC's First Request for On October 3, 2005, EEOC served on Sidley EEOC's First Request for Responses to EEOC's First Request for Admissions. 4. Response nos. 3, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, and 23 of Sidley's Amended and Supplemental Responses do not comply with the requirements of Rule 36 in that they contain extraneous material that does not fairly meet the substance of the requests. Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-00208 Document 60 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 2 of 2 5. EEOC incorporates as though fully set forth herein its memorandum in support of this Motion styled "Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Responses to Requests to Admit Facts." 6. For the reasons stated herein and in the supporting memorandum, Sidley should be deemed to have admitted the matters to which it has not provided responses that comply with Rule 36. WHEREFORE, EEOC respectfully requests entry of an order deeming admitted without qualification request nos. 3, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, and 23 of its First Request for Admissions. Respectfully submitted, s/ Justin Mulaire Laurie S. Elkin Justin Mulaire Trial Attorney Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 500 W. Madison Street Suite 2800 Chicago, Illinois 60661 (312) 353-7726

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?