Riddle et al v. National Security Agency, Inc., et al
Filing
187
MOTION by Plaintiffs Linda Riddle, Ricardo Woods for judgment entry (Fuoco, Steven)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTIRCT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LINDA RIDDLE and RICARDO WOODS, individually, and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, INC. and IBRIHIM A. KISWANI Defendants, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case No. 05 C 5880 Judge Ronald A. Guzman Magistrate Geraldine Soat-Brown
PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ENTRY Plaintiffs, LINDA RIDDLE and RICARDO WOODS, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, by their attorney, STEVEN C. FUOCO moves the Court for an Order entering judgment in their favor and their attorney, STEVEN C. FUOCO and against defendants for the amount of reasonable attorney fees and nontaxable costs as determined by the April 23, 2010 Memorandum Opinion and Order of the Magistrate Judge, and in support thereof, state as follows: 1. On April 23, 2010, Magistrate Judge Soat-Brown entered her
Memorandum Opinion and Order [Doc. 186] resolving plaintiff's L.R. 54.3(f) Motion for Award of Attorney Fee and Non-Taxable Costs [Doc. 173]. 2. The Magistrate Judge's Memorandum Opinion and Order awarded a total
of $23,800.34 to plaintiffs and counsel, consisting of $23,061.04 as a reasonable attorney's fee of plaintiffs' counsel and $739.30 for non-taxable costs [Doc. 185]. 3. The Rule 72 fourteen (14) period for the written submission of objections
to the April 23, 2010 Magistrate Judge's Memorandum Opinion and Order passed on 1
May 7, 2010 without the service of any written objections. 4. Accordingly, the District Court should enter judgment on the Magistrate
Judge's findings and direct the Clerk to tax costs. Respectfully Submitted, /s/Steven C. Fuoco Steven C. Fuoco Counsel for Plaintiffs
Steven C. Fuoco 1055 Golf Avenue Highland Park, IL 60035 847/432-LAWS (5297) Court ID No. 6206935
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?