Chicago Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Inc. v. Craigslist, Inc.

Filing 28

MOTION by Amicus Parties Amazon.Com, Inc., AOL LLC, eBay Inc., Electronic Frontier Foundation, Google Inc., Internet Commerce Coalition, NetChoice, NetCoalition, United States Internet Service Provider Association, Yahoo! Inc. for leave to file Amicus Brief (Amended Motion) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Amicus Brief# 2 Exhibit Unpublished Opinions)(Fifer, Samuel)

Download PDF
Chicago Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Inc. v. Craigslist, Inc. Doc. 28 Case 1:06-cv-00657 Document 28 Filed 06/22/2006 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CHICAGO LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, INC. Plaintiff v. CRAIGSLIST, INC. Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Judge Amy J. St. Eve Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole Case No. 06 C 0657 AMENDED MOTION OF AMICI AMAZON.COM, INC., AOL LLC, EBAY INC., GOOGLE INC., YAHOO! INC., ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, INTERNET COMMERCE COALITION, NETCHOICE, NETCOALITION, AND UNITED STATES INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER ASSOCIATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMICUS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CRAIGSLIST'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS The undersigned Amici, ten companies and trade associations that represent many of the leading members of the Nation's online and electronic communications industries, hereby respectfully request leave to file the accompanying amicus curiae brief. The Amici include companies that provide many of the country's most popular and wellknown interactive computer services and trade associations that represent the entire range of participants in today's diverse and fast-growing online industry. They seek to provide the industry perspective concerning the extremely negative implications that adoption of the plaintiff's position would have on the continued development and growth of online services and related electronic media. The legal question presented by craigslist's motion for judgment on the pleadings focuses on the interpretation of a federal statutory provision, 47 U.S.C. § 230 ("Section 230"). Courts across the country have confirmed that Section 230(c)(1) immunizes online intermediaries from Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:06-cv-00657 Document 28 Filed 06/22/2006 Page 2 of 7 claims based on the dissemination of third-party content. Contrary to this virtually uniform body of case law and the plain language of the statute, the plaintiff and the National Fair Housing Alliance ("NFHA") nonetheless urge the Court to adopt the radical position that Section 230(c)(1) does not provide immunity from liability for third-party content at all. The plaintiff's position would have far-reaching consequences: Although the particular claim at issue in this case is based on the Fair Housing Act, the theory advanced by the plaintiff would appear to apply equally to any claim based on third-party content, and would thus undermine substantially the important federal policies reflected in Section 230. The Amici and the companies they represent provide interactive computer services through which staggering quantities of third-party information flow every day. Indeed, many of the Amici have been involved as defendants in the leading cases interpreting Section 230. The strong interest of the Amici in the legal issues presented by this case, and the expertise that they can therefore bring, are apparent in a brief description of their businesses: · Amazon.com, Inc., which opened on the World Wide Web in July 1995, is an online service that seeks to be where customers can find and discover anything they might want to buy online, and endeavors to offer its customers the lowest possible prices. Through Amazon's flagship website, Amazon.com, it and other sellers offer millions of unique new, refurbished and used items in categories such as health and personal care, jewelry and watches, gourmet food, sports and outdoors, apparel and accessories, books, music, DVDs, electronics and office, toys and baby, and home and garden. · AOL LLC is the largest Internet service provider in the United States. Its flagship AOL service has many millions of members and offers numerous forums through which members may post content and messages to communicate with one another, including hundreds of message boards and chat rooms, as well as areas where users can post reviews of a wide variety of products and services. In addition, AOL operates the AOL.com website and numerous other websites through which users can disseminate content. · eBay Inc. pioneered the online auction-style trading format, creating a forum in which todayalmost two hundred million users can sell goods directly to each other. In addition to the vast array of third-party content that comprises the eBay marketplace, eBay permits 14499268\V-2 Case 1:06-cv-00657 Document 28 Filed 06/22/2006 Page 3 of 7 buyers and sellers to rate and comment on their dealings with one another, and provides a Feedback Forum that compiles and displays these ratings and comments.1 · Google Inc. provides a variety of online services including the Google Web Search service that is based on an index of more than eight billion Web pages from content providers around the world, the Google Groups service that maintains archives of many millions of Usenet postings dating from 1981 to the present, and the Google Base service, which allows users to post and categorize content of virtually any kind directly to Google. · Yahoo! Inc. offers a comprehensive network of services to more than 411 million individuals each month worldwide. Yahoo! offers a variety of services for third parties to share content on the Yahoo! network, including hosting millions of personal websites, message boards on more than 80,000 topics with millions of messages, a Web search engine and online directory, online photo albums, and more. · Electronic Frontier Foundation is a non-profit, member-supported civil liberties organization working to protect rights in the digital world. EFF actively encourages and challenges industry, government, and the courts to support free expression, privacy, and openness in the information society. Founded in 1990, EFF is based in San Francisco. EFF is particularly concerned that laws and regulations not be used to stifle free expression on the Internet by holding platforms liable where the content in question originates with a third party. EFF has members all over the United States and maintains one of the most-linked-to websites (http://www.eff.org) in the world. · Internet Commerce Coalition is a coalition of leading Internet Service Providers, ecommerce companies, and trade associations in the United States. The ICC's mission is to achieve a legal environment that allows service providers, their customers, and other users to do business on the global Internet under reasonable rules governing liability and use of technology. · NetChoice is a coalition of online businesses and consumers who are united in promoting the increased choice and convenience enabled by e-commerce. NetChoice members have a direct interest in preventing obstacles to e-commerce, such as the threat of incurring liability for content provided by third parties. · NetCoalition serves as the public policy voice for some of the world's largest and most innovative Internet companies on key public policy matters affecting the online world. Its members include providers of search technology, hosting services, ISPs, and Web portal services. · For purposes of full disclosure, eBay notes that it has a minority stake of approximately 25% in defendant craigslist. 1 14499268\V-2 Case 1:06-cv-00657 Document 28 Filed 06/22/2006 Page 4 of 7 · The United States Internet Service Provider Association is a national trade association that represents the common policy and legal concerns of the major American Internet service providers and network communications providers. By the very nature of their businesses, and the businesses of the companies that they represent, the Amici have considerable experience with this area of the law and an obviously strong interest in the issues presented by this case. They are therefore well-situated to offer helpful analysis and insights regarding the meaning, scope and application of Section 230, as well as the adverse consequences that would result if the plaintiff's position were adopted. Counsel for craigslist has indicated that craigslist consents to the filing of an amicus curiae brief from these Amici. Counsel for plaintiff has declined to provide such consent. Leave for Amici to file the accompanying brief is especially appropriate in light of the fact that this Court already has approved the filing of, and received, an amicus brief discussing the policy implications of this case from the perspective of the NFHA, an organization whose views and interests are closely aligned with those of the plaintiff. Further, Amici understand that not only did plaintiff consent to the filing of NFHA's amicus brief, but that plaintiff actually filed the motion itself. For these reasons, the Amici respectfully request leave to file the accompanying brief in support of craigslist's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Samuel Fifer Marc J. Zwillinger (ARDC # 6226447) Samuel Fifer (ARDC # 0803006) Julie Samuels (ARDC # 6287282) SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLP 7800 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Drive 14499268\V-2 Case 1:06-cv-00657 Document 28 Filed 06/22/2006 Page 5 of 7 Chicago, Illinois 60606 Counsel for Amici Amazon.Com, Inc., AOL LLC, eBay Inc., Google Inc., Yahoo! Inc., Electronic Frontier Foundation, Internet Commerce Coalition, NetChoice, NetCoalition, and United States Internet Service Provider Association (Additional counsel listed on next page) 14499268\V-2 Case 1:06-cv-00657 Document 28 Filed 06/22/2006 Page 6 of 7 Of Counsel: David A. Zapolsky Vice President & Associate General Counsel Amazon.com, Inc. 1200 12 Avenue S., Suite 1200 Seattle, WA 98144 David C. Goldberg Chief Litigation Counsel AOL LLC 22000 AOL Way Dulles, VA 20166 Jay Monahan Vice President & Deputy General Counsel Michael J. Richter Senior Counsel, Litigation & Intellectual Property eBay Inc. 2145 Hamilton Avenue San Jose, CA 95125 Michael S. Kwun Litigation Counsel Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, CA 94043 Elizabeth Banker Associate General Counsel Yahoo! Inc. 444 North Capitol Street NW Suite 605 Washington, DC 20001 Kurt Opsahl Staff Attorney Electronic Frontier Foundation 454 Shotwell Street San Francisco CA 94110-1914 James J. Halpert DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary US LLP 1200 19th Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 General Counsel, Internet Commerce Coalition Markham Erickson General Counsel NetCoalition 400 North Capital Street, NW, Ste. 585 Washington, D.C. 20001 Steve DelBianco Executive Director NetChoice 1413 K Street, NW, 12th Floor Washington, DC 20005 Marc J. Zwillinger General Counsel US Internet Service Provider Association 1330 Connecticut Ave., NW Washington, DC 20036 14499268\V-2 Case 1:06-cv-00657 Document 28 Filed 06/22/2006 Page 7 of 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Julie Samuels, certify that I caused a copy of the preceding AMENDED MOTION OF AMICI AMAZON.COM, INC., AOL LLC, EBAY INC., GOOGLE INC., YAHOO! INC., ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, INTERNET COMMERCE COALITION, NETCHOICE, NETCOALITION, AND UNITED STATES INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER ASSOCIATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMICUS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CRAIGSLIST'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS to be served by e-mail to Stephen D. Libowsky and Laurie Wardell via the ECF system of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, and by Federal Express delivery to Stephen D. Libowsky and Laurie Wardell on this 22st day of June, 2006. /s/ Julie Samuels Julie Samuels 14499268\V-2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?