Lott v. Levitt et al

Filing 10

NOTICE of Motion by David P. Sanders for presentment of motion for extension of time 9 before Honorable Ruben Castillo on 5/24/2006 at 09:45 AM. (Sanders, David)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOHN R. LOTT, JR., Plaintiff, v. STEVEN D. LEVITT and HARPERCOLLINS PUBLISHERS INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 06 C 2007 Honorable Ruben Castillo NOTICE OF MOTION TO: [See Attached Service List] PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Wednesday, May 24, 2006, at 9:45 a.m., I shall appear before the Honorable Ruben Castillo in Room 2319 of the Dirksen Federal Building, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois, or any judge sitting in his stead, and then and there present the Defendants' Agreed Motion to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead to Complaint, a copy of which is hereby served upon you. STEVEN D. LEVITT and HARPERCOLLINS PUBLISHERS INC. By: David P. Sanders (#02452359) JENNER & BLOCK LLP One IBM Plaza Chicago, Illinois 606011 Telephone: 312-222-9350 Of Counsel: Slade R. Metcalf Gail C. Gove HOGAN & HARTSON L.L.P. 875 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 Telephone: 212-918-3000 s/ David P. Sanders One of their attorneys SERVICE LIST Stephen H. Marcus, Esq. Law Office of Stephen H. Marcus 1050 17th Street N.W. Suite 600 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 331-7272 Thomas A. Vickers, Esq. Vanek, Vickers & Masini, P.C. 225 W. Washington Street 18th Floor Chicago, Illinois 60606 (312) 224-1510 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, David P. Sanders, an attorney in this matter, certify that on May 17, 2006, I caused copies of the foregoing Defendants' Agreed Motion to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead to Complaint to be served on the persons identified on the attached service list via telecopier and by depositing a copy in the United States mail, proper first-class postage prepaid. s/ David P. Sanders David P. Sanders CHICAGO_1405701_1 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?