Lott v. Levitt et al
NOTICE of Motion by Mark L. Johnson for presentment of motion for leave to file 60 before Honorable Ruben Castillo on 8/8/2007 at 09:45 AM. (Johnson, Mark)
Lott v. Levitt et al
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOHN R. LOTT, JR., Plaintiff, vs. STEVEN D. LEVITT and HARPERCOLLINS PUBLISHERS, INC. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case No. 06 C 2007 Honorable Judge Castillo
NOTICE OF MOTION TO: Slade R. Metcalf Gail C. Gove HOGAN & HARTSON LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 David P. Sanders JENNER & BLOCK 330 North Wabash Avenue Chicago, IL 60611
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on August 8, 2007, at 9:45 a.m., or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, we shall appear before the Honorable Ruben Castillo, or any other judge sitting in his stead in Courtroom 2141 of the Dirksen Federal Building, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL 60603 and there present Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint, a copy of which is attached and served upon you. Respectfully submitted, SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
By: s/ Mark L. Johnson One of His Attorneys Paul E. Freehling Mark L. Johnson SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 131 S. Dearborn Street, Suite 2400 Chicago, Illinois 60603 (312) 460-5000
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Mark L. Johnson, an attorney, certifies that he caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint to be served upon: Gail C. Gove HOGAN & HARTSON LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 David P. Sanders JENNER & BLOCK 330 North Wabash Avenue Chicago, IL 60611 Stephen H. Marcus Law Office of Stephen H. Marcus 1050 17th Street, N.W. Suite 600 Washington, DC 20036 by e-mail (Gail C. Gove and David P. Sanders) and placing same in a properly addressed, postage prepaid envelope and deposited in the U.S. Mail (Stephen H. Marcus) at 131 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois this 30th day of July, 2007. s/ Mark L. Johnson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?