Adams et al v. City Of Chicago et al

Filing 547

MOTION by Plaintiff Seneca Adams for judgment entry (Smith, Christopher)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SENECA ADAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 06 C 4856 v. Judge Charles R. Norgle, Sr. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants. PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Plaintiffs Seneca Adams, Tari Adams, and Sicara Adams, by and through one their attorneys, Christopher Smith, respectfully move this Honorable Court for entry of judgment. In support of this Motion, Plaintiffs state as follows: 1. The trial in this matter began on February 18, 2014. 2. On February 20, 2014, the jury returned a verdict in Plaintiffs’ favor. 3. The jury awarded compensatory damages to Plaintiff Seneca Adams in the amount of $2,400,000.00; and to Plaintiff Tari Adams in the amount of $1,000,000.00. 4. On May 27, 2014, the district cour t entered judgment on the verdict. 5. On Augus t 1, 2014, the dis trict cour t entered a n order gr an ting in Defend a nt’s Rule 59 Motion for Remittitu r. 6. A Notice of Appeal was filed on Augus t 21, 2014 on behalf of Plaintiffs’ Seneca Adams and Tari Adams. 7. On August 14, 2015 the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a final judgment to vacate the district court’s judgments in their cases and remand with instructions to reinstate the jury’s verdict. 8. On September 8, 2015 the Appellate Court’s mandate was filed in the Northern District of Illinois. WHEREFORE Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Honorable Court reinstate the jury’s verdict for Seneca Adams and Tari Adams and enter judgment on the jury verdict in this matter consistent with the mandate of the Appellate Court. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, /s/ Christopher R. Smith One of the Attorneys for Plaintiffs Amanda Antholt Christopher R. Smith Robert W. Johnson One North LaSalle, Suite 2000 Chicago, IL 60602 312.432.0400 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?