Grochocinski v. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP et al

Filing 158

NOTICE of Motion by Stephen Novack for presentment of motion for extension of time to file response/reply,, motion for relief,,, 157 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 8/3/2009 at 09:00 AM. (Novack, Stephen)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION DAVID GROCHOCINSKI, not individually but solely in his capacity as the Chapter 7 Trustee for the bankruptcy estate of CMGT, INC., Plaintiff, v. MAYER BROWN ROWE & MAW LLP and RONALD B. GIVEN Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 06 C 5486 Judge Virginia M. Kendall NOTICE OF UNOPPOSED MOTION To: Edward T. Joyce Arthur W. Aufmann Robert D. Carroll Edward T. Joyce & Assoc., P.C. 11 S. LaSalle St., Suite 1600 Chicago, IL 60603 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on August 3, 2009 at 9:00 a.m, or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, I shall appear before the Honorable Judge Kendall, or any judge sitting in her stead, in the courtroom usually occupied by her at the United States District Court, 219 South Dearborn Street, Room 2319, Chicago, Illinois, and then and there present Defendants’ Amended Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time and Leave to File Oversized Reply, a copy of which has been served upon you by electronic means. Respectfully submitted, MAYER BROWN ROWE & MAW LLP AND RONALD GIVEN /s/ Stephen Novack One Of Their Attorneys Stephen Novack Mitchell L. Marinello Steven J. Ciszewski NOVACK AND MACEY LLP 100 N. Riverside Plaza Chicago, IL 60606 (312) 419-6900 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Stephen Novack, an attorney, hereby certifies that he caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Unopposed Motion to be served through the ECF system upon the following: Edward T. Joyce Arthur W. Aufmann Robert D. Carroll Edward T. Joyce & Assoc., P.C. 11 S. LaSalle St., Suite 1600 Chicago, IL 60603 on this 17th day of July, 2009. /s/ Stephen Novack

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?