Grochocinski v. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP et al

Filing 187

MINUTE entry before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall:Motion hearing held. Motion of attorney David E. Morgans for leave to file his appearance on behalf of plaintiff 182 is granted. Briefing as to motion by movant Gerard Spehar to intervene 173 is set as follows: Response due by 5/27/2010; reply due by 6/10/2010. Briefing as to motion by defendants Ronald B. Given, Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP for sanctions 176 is set as follows: Response due by 6/3/2010; reply due by 6/24/2010. Leave is granted to file response and reply briefs in excess of that page limit, up to 20 pages. Rulings by mail. Motion by movant Gerard Spehar to alter judgment [174} is entered and continued until the Court determines whether he will be allowed to intervene. Mailed (vmj, )

Download PDF
Order Form (01/2005) United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois Name of Assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge CASE NUMBER CASE TITLE Virginia M. Kendall 06 C 5486 Sitting Judge if Other than Assigned Judge DATE 5/7/2010 Grochocinski vs. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw DOCKET ENTRY TEXT Motion hearing held. Motion of attorney David E Morgans for leave to file his appearance on behalf of plaintiff [182] is granted. Briefing as to motion by movant Gerard Spehar to intervene [173] is set as follows: Response due by 5/27/2010; reply due by 6/10/2010. Briefing as to motion by defendants Ronald B Given, Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP for sanctions [176] is set as follows: Response due by 6/3/2010; reply due by 6/24/2010. Leave is granted to file response and reply briefs in excess of the page limit, up to 20 pages. Rulings by mail. Motion by movant Gerard Spehar to alter judgment [174] is entered and continued until the Court determines whether he will be allowed to intervene. Docketing to mail notices. 00:10 06C5486 Grochocinski vs. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw Page 1 of 2 Courtroom Deputy Initials: 06C5486 Grochocinski vs. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw TP Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?