Grochocinski v. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP et al
Filing
192
COPY of order dated 5/13/2010 from the USCA for the Seventh Circuit regarding notice of appeal 175 ; Appellate case no. : 10-2057. Upon consideration of the Appellant's Motion to stay appeal, filed on May 10, 2010, by counsel for the appellant,IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Proceedings in this appeal shall be held in abeyance pending resolution by the district court of the pending motion to intervene. Appellant is ORDERED to file a status report with this court by July 9, 2010 or within 10 days of the district courts resolution of the motion to intervene. (hp, )
Case: 10-2057
Document: 5
Filed: 05/13/2010
Pages: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Everett M cKinley D irksen U nited States C ourthouse
O ffice of the C lerk
R oom 2722 - 219 S. D earborn Street
Ph on e: (312) 435-5850
C hicago, Illinois 60604
w w w .ca7.u scou rts.gov
ORDER
May 13, 2010
BEFORE
DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge
DAVID E. GROCHOCINSKI, not individually, but solely in his
capacity as the Chapter 7 Trustee for the bankruptcy estate of CM GT,
INC.,
Plaintiff - Appellant
No.: 10-2057
v.
M AYER BROW N ROW E & M AW , LLP and RONALD B. GIVEN,
Defendants - Appellees
Originating Case Information:
District Court No: 1:06-cv-05486
Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division
District Judge Virginia M. Kendall
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT’S MOTION TO STAY APPEAL, filed on
May 10, 2010, by counsel for the appellant,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Proceedings in this appeal shall be held
in abeyance pending resolution by the district court of the pending motion to intervene.
Appellant is ORDERED to file a status report with this court by July 9, 2010 or within 10
days of the district court’s resolution of the motion to intervene.
form name: c7_Order_3J (form ID: 177)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?