Grochocinski v. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP et al
Filing
31
NOTICE of Motion by Robert D Carroll for presentment of extension of time 30 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 2/8/2007 at 09:00 AM. (Carroll, Robert)
Grochocinski v. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP et al
Doc. 31
Case 1:06-cv-05486
Document 31
Filed 02/02/2007
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DISTRICT DAVID GROCHOCINSKI, not individually, but solely in his capacity as the Chapter 7 Trustee for the bankruptcy estate of CMGT, INC. Plaintiff, v. MAYER BROWN ROWE & MAW LLP, RONALD B. GIVEN, and CHARLES W. TRAUTNER, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. 06 C 5486 Judge Virginia M. Kendall
NOTICE OF MOTION To: Steven Ciszewski Novak and Macey LLP 100 N. Riverside Plaza Chicago, IL 60606
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Thursday, February 8, 2007 at 9:00 a.m., we shall appear before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall, or any other Judge sitting in her stead, in Room 2319 of the Dirksen Building, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois, and shall then and there present the attached Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Defendant Charles W. Trautner. Dated: February 2, 2007 One of Plaintiff's Attorneys /s/ Robert D. Carroll Edward T. Joyce Arthur W. Aufmann Robert D. Carroll Edward T. Joyce & Associates, P.C. 11 S. LaSalle Street, Suite 1600 Chicago, Illinois 60603 (312) 641-2600 Atty. No. 32513
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 1:06-cv-05486
Document 31
Filed 02/02/2007
Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Robert D. Carroll, an attorney, hereby certify that I caused a true copy of Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Defendant Charles W. Trautner to be served upon the counsel of record via email through the United States District Court Electronic Filing System this 2nd day of February, 2007.
/s/ Robert D. Carroll Robert D. Carroll
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?