Grochocinski v. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP et al

Filing 38

NOTICE of Motion by Robert D Carroll for presentment of extension of time 37 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 4/17/2007 at 09:00 AM. (Carroll, Robert)

Download PDF
Grochocinski v. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP et al Doc. 38 Case 1:06-cv-05486 Document 38 Filed 04/09/2007 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DISTRICT DAVID GROCHOCINSKI, not individually, but solely in his capacity as the Chapter 7 Trustee for the bankruptcy estate of CMGT, INC. Plaintiff, v. MAYER BROWN ROWE & MAW LLP, RONALD B. GIVEN, and CHARLES W. TRAUTNER, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 06 C 5486 Judge Virginia M. Kendall NOTICE OF MOTION To: Steven Ciszewski Novak and Macey LLP 100 N. Riverside Plaza Chicago, IL 60606 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Tuesday, April 17, 2007 at 9:00 a.m., we shall appear before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall, or any other Judge sitting in her stead, in Room 2319 of the Dirksen Building, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois, and shall then and there present the attached Plaintiff's Motion for a Second Extension of Time to Serve Defendant Charles W. Trautner. Dated: April 9, 2007 One of Plaintiff's Attorneys /s/ Robert D. Carroll Edward T. Joyce Arthur W. Aufmann Robert D. Carroll Edward T. Joyce & Associates, P.C. 11 S. LaSalle Street, Suite 1600 Chicago, Illinois 60603 (312) 641-2600 Atty. No. 32513 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:06-cv-05486 Document 38 Filed 04/09/2007 Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Robert D. Carroll, an attorney, hereby certify that I caused a true copy of Plaintiff's Motion for a Second Extension of Time to Serve Defendant Charles W. Trautner to be served upon the counsel of record via email through the United States District Court Electronic Filing System this 9th day of April, 2007. /s/ Robert D. Carroll Robert D. Carroll

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?