Grochocinski v. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP et al

Filing 69

Plaintiff's Request to Admit to Defendant Ronald B. Given by David Grochocinski (Carroll, Robert)

Download PDF
Grochocinski v. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP et al Doc. 69 Case 1:06-cv-05486 Document 69 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DISTRICT DAVID GROCHOCINSKI, not individually, but solely in his capacity as the Chapter 7 Trustee for the bankruptcy estate of CMGT, INC. Plaintiff, v. MAYER BROWN ROWE & MAW LLP, RONALD B. GIVEN, and CHARLES W. TRAUTNER, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 06 C 5486 Judge Virginia M. Kendall PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO ADMIT TO DEFENDANT RONALD B. GIVEN Plaintiff, by his attorneys, requests pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36, that defendant Ronald B. Given admit or deny the following facts within 30 days after service of these Requests to Admit. Request No. 1: The default judgment that Spehar Capital LLC obtained against CMGT, Inc. on March 18, 2004 was obtained as a result of Ronald B. Given's negligence. ANSWER: Respectfully submitted, DAVID GROCHOCINSKI, not individually, but solely in his capacity as the Chapter 7 Trustee for the bankruptcy estate of CMGT, INC. By:______\\s\\ Robert D. Carroll_____________ Plaintiff's attorneys Edward T. Joyce Arthur W. Aufmann Robert D. Carroll EDWARD T. JOYCE & ASSOC., P.C. - Atty No. 32513 11 South LaSalle Street, Ste., 1600 Chicago, Illinois 60603 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:06-cv-05486 Document 69 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned attorney certifies that on November 6, 2007, he caused the attached PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO ADMIT TO DEFENDANT RONALD B. GIVEN to be served upon Stephen Novack Mitchell L. Marinello Steven J. Ciszewski NOVACK AND MACEY LLP 100 N. Riverside Plaza Chicago, IL 60606 via electronically delivering through the Court's CM/ECF filing system. _____/s/ Robert D. Carroll ____________

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?