Grochocinski v. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP et al
Filing
69
Plaintiff's Request to Admit to Defendant Ronald B. Given by David Grochocinski (Carroll, Robert)
Grochocinski v. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP et al
Doc. 69
Case 1:06-cv-05486
Document 69
Filed 11/06/2007
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DISTRICT DAVID GROCHOCINSKI, not individually, but solely in his capacity as the Chapter 7 Trustee for the bankruptcy estate of CMGT, INC. Plaintiff, v. MAYER BROWN ROWE & MAW LLP, RONALD B. GIVEN, and CHARLES W. TRAUTNER, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. 06 C 5486 Judge Virginia M. Kendall
PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO ADMIT TO DEFENDANT RONALD B. GIVEN Plaintiff, by his attorneys, requests pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36, that defendant Ronald B. Given admit or deny the following facts within 30 days after service of these Requests to Admit. Request No. 1: The default judgment that Spehar Capital LLC obtained against CMGT, Inc. on March 18, 2004 was obtained as a result of Ronald B. Given's negligence. ANSWER: Respectfully submitted, DAVID GROCHOCINSKI, not individually, but solely in his capacity as the Chapter 7 Trustee for the bankruptcy estate of CMGT, INC. By:______\\s\\ Robert D. Carroll_____________ Plaintiff's attorneys Edward T. Joyce Arthur W. Aufmann Robert D. Carroll EDWARD T. JOYCE & ASSOC., P.C. - Atty No. 32513 11 South LaSalle Street, Ste., 1600 Chicago, Illinois 60603
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 1:06-cv-05486
Document 69
Filed 11/06/2007
Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned attorney certifies that on November 6, 2007, he caused the attached PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO ADMIT TO DEFENDANT RONALD B. GIVEN to be served upon Stephen Novack Mitchell L. Marinello Steven J. Ciszewski NOVACK AND MACEY LLP 100 N. Riverside Plaza Chicago, IL 60606 via electronically delivering through the Court's CM/ECF filing system.
_____/s/ Robert D. Carroll
____________
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?