Grochocinski v. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP et al

Filing 97

Plaintiff's Submission Regarding Dexia Credit Local v. Rogan by David Grochocinski (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Carroll, Robert)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DISTRICT DAVID GROCHOCINSKI, not individually, but solely in his capacity as the Chapter 7 Trustee for the bankruptcy estate of CMGT, INC. Plaintiff, v. MAYER BROWN ROWE & MAW LLP, RONALD B. GIVEN, and CHARLES W. TRAUTNER, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 06 C 5486 Judge Virginia M. Kendall Magistrate Judge Morton Denlow PLAINTIFF’S SUBMISSION REGARDING DEXIA CREDIT LOCAL V. ROGAN, 231 F.R.D. 287 (N.D. Ill. 2005). On May 14, 2008, this Court heard oral argument on Plaintiffs’ fully briefed memorandum in support of his privilege log assertions. In Plaintiff’s opening brief, he cited Dexia Credit Local v. Rogan, 231 F.R.D. 268 (N.D.Ill 2004) in support of his argument that the “common interest” doctrine applies. During oral argument, this Court referred to Dexia Credit Local v. Rogan, 231 F.R.D. 287 (N.D.Ill 2005.) Because that case was not addressed in the parties’ briefs, this Court gave the parties leave to file a supplemental brief addressing that case’s findings regarding the common interest doctrine. Plaintiff appreciates being given the opportunity to file a brief addressing that case, but Plaintiff is going to stand on the arguments submitted in his briefs and during oral argument. Dated: May 19, 2008 Respectfully submitted, DAVID GROCHOCINSKI, not individually, but solely in his capacity as the Chapter 7 Trustee for the bankruptcy estate of CMGT, INC. BY: ____/s/ Robert D. Carroll___________ Plaintiff’s attorneys Edward T. Joyce Arthur W. Aufmann Robert D. Carroll EDWARD T. JOYCE & ASSOC., P.C. - Atty No. 32513 11 South LaSalle Street, Ste., 1600 Chicago, Illinois 60603

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?